HostWETH.E vs USD0++ — price, size and safety, side by side
WETH.E (Avalanche) vs USD0++ (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WETH.E vs USD0++ — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| WETH.E | USD0++ | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.69K | $0.9731 |
| Market cap | $38.33M | — |
| 24h volume | $16.10M | $4.15 |
| Liquidity | $3.08M | $5.46M |
| FDV | $38.33M | $504.34M |
| Holders | 83,532 | 2,713 |
| Age (days) | 343 | 528 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- USD0++ measures ~1.8× the liquidity of WETH.E
- WETH.E measures ~3,879,065× the 24h volume of USD0++
- WETH.E measures ~31× the holder count of USD0++
What the data says
WETH.E
WETH.E is ether carried onto Avalanche through the bridge — the ".e" suffix is Avalanche’s marking for a bridge-minted asset, and the deployment at 0x49d5c2bdffac6ce2bfdb6640f4f80f226bc10bab is that representation of wrapped ether on this chain.
Our September 27, 2026 snapshot counts 14.4 thousand tokens across 83,532 holders — a $38.3 million market cap with $3.1 million of tracked pool liquidity and $23.8 million traded in the last day, deep for the footprint. The 59.4% top-ten share is the shape a bridged asset takes when its float pools in a few large wallets.
USD0++
USD0++ is Usual Protocol's bonded T-bill — the yield-bearing form of its USD0 stablecoin, structured as a liquid bond that locks the underlying for a term and pays boosted yield for the commitment. The deployment 0x35d8949372d46b7a3d5a56006ae77b215fc69bc0 is the mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $5.5 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: the "++" is duration — USD0++ trades instant redeemability for a locked term in exchange for protocol yield, which means it can and does trade below the dollar value of the USD0 inside it when the market marks that lock-up at a discount. A holder isn't buying a stablecoin; they're buying a bond with a market price.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WETH.E or USD0++?
By tracked market cap: WETH.E (Avalanche) measures $38.33M and USD0++ (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WETH.E or USD0++?
On the contract checks we publish: WETH.E (Avalanche) grades B and USD0++ (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WETH.E and USD0++ performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show WETH.E at −0.56% and USD0++ at −0.76%.
More comparisons
SPX vs WETH.EWETH.E vs MANEKIWETH.E vs ARBWETH.E vs WBTCUSD0++ vs FLOKIUSD0++ vs SDAIUSD0++ vs STLINKMOG vs USD0++
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.