HostUSD0++ vs STLINK — price, size and safety, side by side
USD0++ (Ethereum) vs STLINK (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
USD0++ vs STLINK — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-26T21:07:21
| USD0++ | STLINK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9731 | $11.42 |
| Market cap | — | $98.68M |
| 24h volume | $4.15 | $1.03M |
| Liquidity | $5.46M | $5.38M |
| FDV | $504.34M | $98.68M |
| Holders | 2,713 | 1,857 |
| Age (days) | 528 | 513 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- STLINK measures ~248,916× the 24h volume of USD0++
What the data says
USD0++
USD0++ is Usual Protocol's bonded T-bill — the yield-bearing form of its USD0 stablecoin, structured as a liquid bond that locks the underlying for a term and pays boosted yield for the commitment. The deployment 0x35d8949372d46b7a3d5a56006ae77b215fc69bc0 is the mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $5.5 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: the "++" is duration — USD0++ trades instant redeemability for a locked term in exchange for protocol yield, which means it can and does trade below the dollar value of the USD0 inside it when the market marks that lock-up at a discount. A holder isn't buying a stablecoin; they're buying a bond with a market price.
STLINK
Staked LINK is LINK deposited into Chainlink's native staking — the token that secures the oracle network's economic guarantees and earns emissions for doing it. The deployment 0xb8b295df2cd735b15be5eb419517aa626fc43cd5 is the staking receipt; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $5.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest shape: stLINK trades LINK's oracle-usage thesis with a staking yield on top and a liquidity discount underneath — the staked form exits slower than the base asset, and the yield is emissions-funded rather than fee-funded, which makes it a bet on the network's token economics holding their value, not on fees it collects.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USD0++ or STLINK?
By tracked market cap: USD0++ (Ethereum) measures — and STLINK (Ethereum) measures $98.68M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USD0++ or STLINK?
On the contract checks we publish: USD0++ (Ethereum) grades B and STLINK (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USD0++ and STLINK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-26T21:07:21, the measured snapshots show USD0++ at 0.00% and STLINK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USD0++ vs SDAIMOG vs USD0++USD0++ vs ZECSPCXB vs USD0++SDAI vs STLINKSTLINK vs ZECSTLINK vs MUSTLINK vs LONG
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-26T21:07:21; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.