HostWBTC vs ALUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs ALUSD (Optimism) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
WBTC vs ALUSD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| WBTC | ALUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $84.65K | $0.9538 |
| Market cap | $9.83B | $9.99M |
| 24h volume | $30.16M | $1.92K |
| Liquidity | $224.32M | $1.14M |
| FDV | $9.83B | $1.61M |
| Holders | 196,306 | 5,630 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 1,181 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~984× the market cap of ALUSD
- WBTC measures ~196× the liquidity of ALUSD
- WBTC measures ~15,715× the 24h volume of ALUSD
- WBTC measures ~35× the holder count of ALUSD
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $224.3 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
ALUSD
ALUSD at 0xcb8fa9a76b8e203d8c3797bf438d8fb81ea3326a is Alchemix's USD on Optimism — the dollar that backs the protocol's self-repaying loan structure, where deposited collateral's yield amortizes the borrow. The September 26, 2026 snapshot prices a $10.0 million asset-wide market cap against a $1.6 million fully-diluted read of the local float of 1.7 million units — a small Optimism slice of a multi-chain stable.
The local book is deeper than it looks and quieter than it should be: $1.1 million of tracked depth reads deep against that float, while $1.9 thousand of 24-hour volume is a nearly dormant tape — the pool exists; the flow mostly does not. For an exit-sized holder that pairing is the real information: depth on paper, and a tape that rarely tests it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or ALUSD?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.83B and ALUSD (Optimism) measures $9.99M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or ALUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and ALUSD (Optimism) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and ALUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show WBTC at +0.17% and ALUSD at −0.24%.
More comparisons
WBTC vs FWWETHUSDC vs WBTCWBTC vs CRVUSDWETH vs WBTCDORY vs ALUSDDEBIT vs ALUSDH vs ALUSDALUSD vs AKE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.