HostWAMONUSDT0 vs MONCOCK — price, size and safety, side by side
WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) vs MONCOCK (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
WAMONUSDT0 vs MONCOCK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| WAMONUSDT0 | MONCOCK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.01 | $0.0002338 |
| Market cap | — | $185.37K |
| 24h volume | $12.41K | $2.18K |
| Liquidity | $32.87K | $24.74K |
| FDV | $2.74 | $233.81K |
| Holders | 8 | 2,959 |
| Age (days) | 47 | 298 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- WAMONUSDT0 measures ~5.7× the 24h volume of MONCOCK
- MONCOCK measures ~370× the holder count of WAMONUSDT0
What the data says
WAMONUSDT0
WAMONUSDT0 is Aave's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the interest-bearing receipt for USDT0 supplied into Aave's Monad market, where USDT0 is Tether's omnichain dollar built on LayerZero rails. The deployment 0x5e7109a755fd2b86361f95065cde07fbab50ca1d is the receipt contract; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $33 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics stack two layers: the holder owns a claim on USDT0 in Aave (lending yield plus Aave's solvency assumptions) and USDT0 is itself a claim on Tether's reserve routed through LayerZero's bridge — three hops from dollars in a bank. On a new chain, wrapped-receipt depth this early is the chain's money-market actually forming.
MONCOCK
MONCOCK starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. Minting simply isn't in the contract, so dilution isn't on the table, and it can't pause transfers or blacklist wallets either, so your tokens stay yours to move and sell. Neither lever existing is the main reason MONCOCK's 85/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-09-26).
On the market side, MONCOCK brings $24.74K of on-chain liquidity, 2,959 wallets holding and 298 days old as of 2026-09-26. The $24.74K pool stands up well to a ~$185.37K cap — depth like that means MONCOCK absorbs normal flow without the price lurching. A 2,959-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WAMONUSDT0 or MONCOCK?
By tracked market cap: WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) measures — and MONCOCK (Monad) measures $185.37K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WAMONUSDT0 or MONCOCK?
On the contract checks we publish: WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) grades C and MONCOCK (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WAMONUSDT0 and MONCOCK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show WAMONUSDT0 at 0.00% and MONCOCK at +3.11%.
More comparisons
WAMONUSDT0 vs LADYBUGSCOUT vs WAMONUSDT0EDWIN vs WAMONUSDT0BEENZ vs WAMONUSDT0MONCOCK vs OPENCLAWMONCOCK vs QUDEMONCOCK vs MANAMONCOCK vs THUMB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.