HostVSN vs PEAR — price, size and safety, side by side
VSN (Arbitrum) vs PEAR (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
VSN vs PEAR — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| VSN | PEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.04384 | $0.03808 |
| Market cap | $166.29M | $19.57M |
| 24h volume | $61.37K | $90.37K |
| Liquidity | $909.27K | $714.58K |
| FDV | $4.49M | $32.45M |
| Holders | 43,114 | 2,400 |
| Age (days) | 314 | 725 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- VSN measures ~8.5× the market cap of PEAR
- VSN measures ~18× the holder count of PEAR
- over the shared window VSN moved +0.35% while PEAR moved +15.1%
What the data says
VSN
VSN at 0x6fbbbd8bfb1cd3986b1d05e7861a0f62f87db74b — Vision — is an Arbitrum asset 314 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $166.3 million market cap dwarfs the $4.5 million fully-diluted figure priced on the 101.2 million local units — the familiar shape where the headline valuation lives on another venue while this chain carries a slice.
The local book is thin against that headline: $909.3 thousand of tracked depth on $38.5 thousand of daily volume — a quiet book that does its real clearing elsewhere. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot; the authority posture is a live-scan question.
PEAR
PEAR at 0x3212dc0f8c834e4de893532d27cc9b6001684db0 is an Arbitrum asset 725 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $19.6 million market cap with a $32.5 million fully-diluted figure on 852.2 million units showing the emission still ahead.
The book is workable for the cap: $714.6 thousand of tracked depth on $58.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that clears ordinary size and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, VSN or PEAR?
By tracked market cap: VSN (Arbitrum) measures $166.29M and PEAR (Arbitrum) measures $19.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, VSN or PEAR?
On the contract checks we publish: VSN (Arbitrum) grades B and PEAR (Arbitrum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have VSN and PEAR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show VSN at +0.35% and PEAR at +15.1%.
More comparisons
USDT0 vs VSNFWA vs VSNVSN vs UPPPOLY vs VSNPEAR vs GMEPEAR vs DESPXAPEAR vs LFIAVA vs PEAR
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.