Open app

UST vs EPCT — price, size and safety, side by side

UST (Avalanche) vs EPCT (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.

USTC

$0.005974
Axelar Wrapped UST on Avalanche
Trade UST
vs

EPCTA

$0.001945
Epics Token on Solana
Trade EPCT

UST vs EPCT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38

100 — shared start
UST +2.59%  ·  EPCT 0.00% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
USTEPCT
Price$0.005974$0.001945
Market cap$79.67K$1.95M
24h volume$2.06K$0.1193
Liquidity$68.14K$103.64
FDV$88.12K$1.95M
Holders7,2301,920
Age (days)1,705—
Safety gradeCA

Where they differ

What the data says

UST

UST on Avalanche at 0x260bbf5698121eb85e7a74f2e45e16ce762ebe11 — "Axelar Wrapped UST" — is a remnant of the TerraUSD collapse carried over a bridge: what was once the dollar-pegged stablecoin now trades around $0.006, kept alive as a speculative claim on nothing in particular.

At the September 27, 2026 snapshot the book reads like an artifact rather than a market: $68 thousand of liquidity against a $80 thousand cap — a pool bigger than the cap, because the price already found its floor — across 1,705 days of history and a few thousand dollars of daily volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the wrapper's levers are unverified.

Full UST safety read →

EPCT

EPCT — "Epics Token" on Solana, mint CvB1ztJvpYQPvdPBePtRzjL4aQidjydtUz61NWgcgQtP — is the token of Epics: a real developer-bounty platform — a marketplace for open-source bounties — carrying a $1.95 million cap across 1,920 holders.

The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows a billion supply at $0.0019 on a 1.9k file — a real-project remnant. ~$1.1 of daily volume on $104 is a dead book. Freeze revoked; mint unreported; dev wallet 2.3%.

Full EPCT safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, UST or EPCT?

By tracked market cap: UST (Avalanche) measures $79.67K and EPCT (Solana) measures $1.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, UST or EPCT?

On the contract checks we publish: UST (Avalanche) grades C and EPCT (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have UST and EPCT performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show UST at +2.59% and EPCT at 0.00%.

More comparisons

KURUMI vs USTUST vs XAUT0UST vs PAXUST vs CLUDEEPCT vs IBRLLIGHT vs EPCTEPCT vs FIDAWYLDS vs EPCT

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.