HostWYLDS vs EPCT — price, size and safety, side by side
WYLDS (Solana) vs EPCT (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WYLDS vs EPCT — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| WYLDS | EPCT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9999 | $0.001945 |
| Market cap | $168.24M | $1.95M |
| 24h volume | $4.60 | $0.1193 |
| Liquidity | $143.13 | $103.64 |
| FDV | $168.24M | $1.95M |
| Holders | 366 | 1,920 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- WYLDS measures ~86× the market cap of EPCT
- WYLDS measures ~39× the 24h volume of EPCT
- EPCT measures ~5.2× the holder count of WYLDS
- over the shared window WYLDS moved +0.50% while EPCT moved −11.0%
What the data says
WYLDS
WYLDS — wYLDS — is a wrapped yield-bearing token on Solana whose printed cap badly outruns its market. The mint 8fr7WGTVFszfyNWRMXj6fRjZZAnDwmXwEpCrtzmUkdih is what our scan tracks: $168.2 million market cap on $143 of pool liquidity with 366 holders as of September 26, 2026.
That is the most extreme cap-to-door ratio in this batch: two hundred dollars of pool under a hundred-forty-million cap. Wrapped yield tokens often route most of their supply through the issuer's own mint-and-redeem path rather than through public pools — which would explain rather than excuse the figure — but either way, a public exit priced through this pool is not available at the printed valuation. Treat the cap as arithmetic.
EPCT
EPCT — "Epics Token" on Solana, mint CvB1ztJvpYQPvdPBePtRzjL4aQidjydtUz61NWgcgQtP — is the token of Epics: a real developer-bounty platform — a marketplace for open-source bounties — carrying a $1.95 million cap across 1,920 holders.
The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows a billion supply at $0.0019 on a 1.9k file — a real-project remnant. ~$1.1 of daily volume on $104 is a dead book. Freeze revoked; mint unreported; dev wallet 2.3%.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WYLDS or EPCT?
By tracked market cap: WYLDS (Solana) measures $168.24M and EPCT (Solana) measures $1.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WYLDS or EPCT?
On the contract checks we publish: WYLDS (Solana) grades B and EPCT (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WYLDS and EPCT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show WYLDS at +0.50% and EPCT at −11.0%.
More comparisons
WYLDS vs LIGHTMPST vs WYLDSUST vs WYLDSXLFNTY vs WYLDSEPCT vs IBRLLIGHT vs EPCTEPCT vs FIDAMPST vs EPCT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.