HostUSDG vs CRV — price, size and safety, side by side
USDG (Solana) vs CRV (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
USDG vs CRV — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| USDG | CRV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9999 | $0.3436 |
| Market cap | $670.45M | $539.21M |
| 24h volume | $78.86M | $633.85K |
| Liquidity | $41.19M | $10.48M |
| FDV | $670.45M | $831.96M |
| Holders | 21,226 | 100,872 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- USDG measures ~3.9× the liquidity of CRV
- USDG measures ~124× the 24h volume of CRV
- CRV measures ~4.8× the holder count of USDG
What the data says
USDG
USDG is Paxos's second dollar — the newer stablecoin issued under the same regulated umbrella as PYUSD, but built for the Global Dollar Network, a consortium where the yield on reserves gets shared with the institutions distributing it rather than kept whole by the issuer. On Solana it landed where stablecoins actually move: our September 26, 2026 snapshot shows a market cap of about $670.5 million against 21,226 tracked holders and $41.2 million of on-chain pool liquidity — the deepest profile in this batch, and the reason it grades 100/100.
The honest reading of that grade: a regulated issuer with attested reserves is exactly what the contract side wants, and the distribution deal is why exchanges list it — the incentive that made USDT and USDC entrenched is pointed at growth here. The residual is that "regulated" is a jurisdiction's word for centralized controls: the issuer can freeze balances, and that is a property of the asset, not a defect.
CRV
One thing stands out on CRV, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-09-27 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why CRV is at B (75/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, CRV carries $10.48M of on-chain liquidity and 100,872 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $10.48M of depth beside roughly $539.21M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. A holder base of 100,872 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. Reassuringly, the wallet that created CRV holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDG or CRV?
By tracked market cap: USDG (Solana) measures $670.45M and CRV (Ethereum) measures $539.21M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDG or CRV?
On the contract checks we publish: USDG (Solana) grades A and CRV (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDG and CRV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show USDG at 0.00% and CRV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDG vs WBTCRLUSD vs USDGGHST vs USDGUSDG vs PUMPUSDTB vs CRVSKY vs CRVMEW vs CRVCRV vs SUSDAI
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.