HostUP vs INECLA — price, size and safety, side by side
UP (BNB Chain) vs INECLA (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
UP vs INECLA — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| UP | INECLA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.3038 | $0.000002722 |
| Market cap | $65.63M | $26.24K |
| 24h volume | $9.52M | $8.09 |
| Liquidity | $897.16K | $8.18 |
| FDV | $274.70M | $272.19 |
| Holders | 9,978 | 2,243 |
| Age (days) | 124 | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- UP measures ~2,501× the market cap of INECLA
- UP measures ~109,730× the liquidity of INECLA
- UP measures ~1,176,288× the 24h volume of INECLA
- UP measures ~4.4× the holder count of INECLA
- over the shared window UP moved −10.9% while INECLA moved −100.0%
What the data says
UP
UP at 0x000008d2175f9aeaddb2430c26f8a6f73c5a0000 — Unitas, on a contract padded with zeros at both ends — is a 124-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $65.6 million market cap against a $274.7 million fully-diluted figure on 904.1 million units at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The book is workable and the tape is heavy: $897.2 thousand of tracked depth on $19.6 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
INECLA
INECLA — Inference Labs — is a one-day-old Arbitrum token at 0x583ec1d1b8a2cf085b4ef2cc38b9b6d1c7079b63, priced at a fully diluted $272.2 across 2,243 wallets on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The first-day structure carries two watch items: the deployer wallet holds 9.35% of supply — above the scanners' flag line — and the top ten control about 84.7%, while contract-level controls were not assessed. The debut tape is $8.2 of tracked liquidity against $81.0 thousand of volume — a thin book running hot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UP or INECLA?
By tracked market cap: UP (BNB Chain) measures $65.63M and INECLA (Arbitrum) measures $26.24K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UP or INECLA?
On the contract checks we publish: UP (BNB Chain) grades A and INECLA (Arbitrum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UP and INECLA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show UP at −10.9% and INECLA at −100.0%.
More comparisons
UP vs AAVEVSN vs UPUSDT0 vs UPUP vs FFINECLA vs VLTXUSDTET vs INECLASOLX vs INECLAINECLA vs CLAUDE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.