HostUB vs NVDAB — price, size and safety, side by side
UB (BNB Chain) vs NVDAB (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
UB vs NVDAB — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| UB | NVDAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1447 | $224.84 |
| Market cap | $361.75M | $31.11M |
| 24h volume | $1.65M | $3.52M |
| Liquidity | $2.82M | $2.59M |
| FDV | $281.46M | $31.11M |
| Holders | 70,504 | 130,021 |
| Age (days) | 376 | 54 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- UB measures ~12× the market cap of NVDAB
- NVDAB measures ~2.1× the 24h volume of UB
- NVDAB measures ~1.8× the holder count of UB
What the data says
UB
UB at 0x40b8129b786d766267a7a118cf8c07e31cdb6fde — Unibase — is a BNB Chain asset 376 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $361.7 million market cap against a $281.5 million fully-diluted figure on 1.9 billion units.
The striking measurement is the tape: $16.4 million of 24-hour volume against $2.8 million of thin tracked depth — nearly six times the pool cycles daily, the profile of an asset whose order flow runs through routed venues far more than through this standing book. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
NVDAB
NVDAB at 0x02fca66c1d1afb4e2a7884261eb00f63598a7436 — deployed under the name "NVIDIA Corp" — is a BNB Chain asset 54 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $31.1 million market cap across a 138.4 thousand supply.
The borrowed equity name carries no affiliation by itself — the page's first job on a corporate-themed token is to say that plainly and print the address that actually identifies the contract. The book underneath is real: $2.6 million of deep tracked depth on $3.5 million of 24-hour volume, a tape that turns over more than the pool daily.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UB or NVDAB?
By tracked market cap: UB (BNB Chain) measures $361.75M and NVDAB (BNB Chain) measures $31.11M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UB or NVDAB?
On the contract checks we publish: UB (BNB Chain) grades A and NVDAB (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UB and NVDAB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show UB at +3.93% and NVDAB at +0.04%.
More comparisons
UB vs AUSDUB vs SOLUB vs MSETHNPC vs UBNVDAB vs TFUSDNVDAB vs USDXSYRUPUSDC vs NVDABGMX vs NVDAB
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.