HostTEL vs AMWBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
TEL (Polygon) vs AMWBTC (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
TEL vs AMWBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| TEL | AMWBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001742 | $81.05K |
| Market cap | $172.16M | $5.14M |
| 24h volume | $253.82K | $13.74K |
| Liquidity | $1.43M | $943.43K |
| FDV | $67.12M | $5.03M |
| Holders | 35,353 | 9,807 |
| Age (days) | 327 | 1,518 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- TEL measures ~34× the market cap of AMWBTC
- TEL measures ~1.5× the liquidity of AMWBTC
- TEL measures ~18× the 24h volume of AMWBTC
- TEL measures ~3.6× the holder count of AMWBTC
What the data says
TEL
TEL at 0xdf7837de1f2fa4631d716cf2502f8b230f1dcc32 is Telcoin's remittance asset in its PoS-bridged Polygon form — the payments token aimed at telecom corridors, carried to the chain where its retail flow actually trades. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices a $172.2 million asset-wide market cap against a $67.1 million fully-diluted read of the local float — 38.3 billion units sitting on this chain.
The book is honest mid-cap shape: $1.4 million of tracked pool depth is workable for the size, on $72.2 thousand of 24-hour volume — a working tape rather than a churn chart. The deployment is 327 days into this index's record.
AMWBTC
AMWBTC — Aave's Polygon-market WBTC receipt at 0x5c2ed810328349100a66b82b78a1791b101c9d61 — is not a token you buy so much as a receipt the Aave pool issued when someone deposited WBTC: it tracks a claim on the deposited bitcoin plus accrued interest, priced at $81,051 per unit on a 62-unit supply at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The profile fits a receipt token: an upgradeable proxy by design (Aave upgrades market logic behind the same addresses), verified source, $943 thousand of healthy depth, 9,807 holders, and 1,518 days of operation. The ten largest wallets hold about 53.4% of the tiny unit supply — expected, since the biggest depositors hold the most receipts.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TEL or AMWBTC?
By tracked market cap: TEL (Polygon) measures $172.16M and AMWBTC (Polygon) measures $5.14M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TEL or AMWBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: TEL (Polygon) grades B and AMWBTC (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TEL and AMWBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show TEL at −0.81% and AMWBTC at +3.57%.
More comparisons
TSLAX vs TELZEN vs TELATH vs TELTEL vs TBTCFWOG vs AMWBTCPOOLS vs AMWBTCTOSHI vs AMWBTCCOOL vs AMWBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.