HostTBTC vs CLANKER — price, size and safety, side by side
TBTC (Ethereum) vs CLANKER (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
TBTC vs CLANKER — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| TBTC | CLANKER | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $83.41K | $14.27 |
| Market cap | $348.57M | $14.07M |
| 24h volume | $346.17K | $628.31K |
| Liquidity | $26.61M | $1.26M |
| FDV | $348.57M | $14.07M |
| Holders | 25,225 | 466,199 |
| Age (days) | 871 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- TBTC measures ~25× the market cap of CLANKER
- TBTC measures ~21× the liquidity of CLANKER
- CLANKER measures ~1.8× the 24h volume of TBTC
- CLANKER measures ~18× the holder count of TBTC
What the data says
TBTC
tBTC is Threshold Network's trust-minimized wrapped Bitcoin — the decentralized-custody answer to WBTC, where a rotating set of node operators secures the BTC rather than a single custodian. The deployment 0x18084fba666a33d37592fa2633fd49a74dd93a88 is the v2 mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $26.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest contrast is the whole point of the asset: tBTC trades BitGo's institutional custody for a threshold-signature committee — no single company can lose or freeze the coins, but the security model is cryptographic-economic (operator collateral) rather than legal, which is a different risk shape, not a strictly smaller one. Its depth vs WBTC's billions is the market's honest verdict on how much that trade matters to people.
CLANKER
CLANKER clears the most important contract test cleanly. The contract can't create new tokens — the supply is capped for good, and no wallet can be blacklisted either, so no one can hold your tokens in place. That leaves CLANKER at a healthy 100/100 as of 2026-09-27, with only normal market risk left to price in.
On the market side, CLANKER brings $1.26M of on-chain liquidity and a holder base of 466,199 as of 2026-09-27. Against roughly $14.07M in market cap, the $1.26M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A holder base of 466,199 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. Reassuringly, the wallet that created CLANKER holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TBTC or CLANKER?
By tracked market cap: TBTC (Ethereum) measures $348.57M and CLANKER (Base) measures $14.07M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TBTC or CLANKER?
On the contract checks we publish: TBTC (Ethereum) grades B and CLANKER (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TBTC and CLANKER performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show TBTC at 0.00% and CLANKER at 0.00%.
More comparisons
TBTC vs USD1TBTC vs GHOTBTC vs UNITBTC vs FRXUSDTAG vs CLANKERCLANKER vs BRETTASTEROID vs CLANKERCLANKER vs MORPHO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.