HostTAROT vs WLD — price, size and safety, side by side
TAROT (Optimism) vs WLD (Optimism) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
TAROT vs WLD — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| TAROT | WLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.03203 | $0.5355 |
| Market cap | $2.07M | $1.99B |
| 24h volume | $1.41K | $61.51K |
| Liquidity | $199.92K | $122.71K |
| FDV | $1.27M | $226.15M |
| Holders | 2,464 | 1,284,272 |
| Age (days) | 1,149 | 811 |
| Safety grade | D | D |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~963× the market cap of TAROT
- TAROT measures ~1.6× the liquidity of WLD
- WLD measures ~44× the 24h volume of TAROT
- WLD measures ~521× the holder count of TAROT
- over the shared window TAROT moved +6.04% while WLD moved +20.1%
What the data says
TAROT
TAROT at 0x1f514a61bcde34f94bc39731235690ab9da737f7 is the Optimism deployment of the Tarot lending-protocol token — 1,149 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot and priced at a $2.1 million market cap above a $1.3 million fully-diluted figure on 41.5 million units.
The distribution is the decisive read: the creator wallet alone holds 69.4% of supply, and the ten largest wallets hold 99.5% — a functionally single-party book behind 2,464 listed holders. The contract compounds it: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted, while freeze is revoked and it is not a proxy. $199.9 thousand of deep tracked depth sees only $1.4 thousand of daily volume — a quiet tape.
WLD
WLD on Optimism at 0xdc6ff44d5d932cbd77b52e5612ba0529dc6226f1 is the bridged form of Worldcoin's token — the asset behind the orb-verified World ID network — and the September 27, 2026 snapshot hands it a D grade for reasons worth reading rather than guessing.
The flags are measured, not rumored. Minting is still possible on this contract — new supply can be minted — and the owner retains the ability to change balances. Freeze authority is revoked; that is the one lever the code lacks. Powers like these are the standard anatomy of a bridge-issued layer-two token — the bridge has to be able to issue the claim — but they sit on the contract either way. 1,284,272 wallets hold it on Optimism with the ten largest wallets at 72.7% of supply, and the thin end is the exit: $122.7 thousand of tracked pool depth against a $2.0 billion asset-wide cap, with $41.6 thousand changing hands in a day.
FAQ
Which is bigger, TAROT or WLD?
By tracked market cap: TAROT (Optimism) measures $2.07M and WLD (Optimism) measures $1.99B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, TAROT or WLD?
On the contract checks we publish: TAROT (Optimism) grades D and WLD (Optimism) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have TAROT and WLD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show TAROT at +6.04% and WLD at +20.1%.
More comparisons
EPIK vs TAROTVCHF vs TAROTTAROT vs HEEBOOTAROT vs USDVWLD vs OPUSAURY vs WLDPOL vs WLDWLD vs PERPSPAD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.