HostSUSDAI vs PENDLE — price, size and safety, side by side
SUSDAI (Arbitrum) vs PENDLE (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
SUSDAI vs PENDLE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| SUSDAI | PENDLE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.11 | $2.64 |
| Market cap | $496.25M | $457.55M |
| 24h volume | $510.46K | $1.20M |
| Liquidity | $10.13M | $3.40M |
| FDV | $355.11M | $38.28M |
| Holders | 3,094 | 70,287 |
| Age (days) | 220 | 1,293 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- SUSDAI measures ~3.0× the liquidity of PENDLE
- PENDLE measures ~2.3× the 24h volume of SUSDAI
- PENDLE measures ~23× the holder count of SUSDAI
What the data says
SUSDAI
SUSDAI is the staked wrapper of USDai — the yield-bearing form of a dollar token issued against AI-infrastructure financing — trading on Arbitrum at 0x0b2b2b2076d95dda7817e785989fe353fe955ef9. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $10.1 million of tracked pool liquidity, the deepest single line item in this slice of the index.
What the numbers say: roughly seven months of trading history behind it, about $2.2 million of 24-hour volume against that liquidity base — a turnover ratio near 12%, the shape of a yield instrument held rather than churned. The ~$1.11 print against a $1-asset wrapper is consistent with accrued staking yield rather than a broken peg, though the snapshot alone cannot separate the two.
PENDLE
PENDLE on Arbitrum at 0x0c880f6761f1af8d9aa9c466984b80dab9a8c9e8 is the bridged deployment of the yield-tokenization protocol's token — the asset behind the principal-and-yield-splitting market that turned fixed yield into a DeFi primitive. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices the Arbitrum-local supply of 14.6 million units at $38.3 million fully diluted, against an asset-wide $457.6 million market cap.
$3.4 million of tracked pool depth on this chain is thin measured the way the depth flag measures — against the asset-wide figure — but functional: $632.8 thousand of 24-hour volume moves through it. The 1,293-day record belongs to a token whose liquidity genuinely spans chains, with Ethereum holding the canonical supply and Arbitrum holding the routed share, so the local book is a window on the market rather than the market itself.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUSDAI or PENDLE?
By tracked market cap: SUSDAI (Arbitrum) measures $496.25M and PENDLE (Arbitrum) measures $457.55M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUSDAI or PENDLE?
On the contract checks we publish: SUSDAI (Arbitrum) grades B and PENDLE (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUSDAI and PENDLE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show SUSDAI at +0.15% and PENDLE at −4.03%.
More comparisons
SUSDAI vs WETHCRV vs SUSDAIUSDTB vs SUSDAISUSDAI vs 牛来PENDLE vs WBTCPENDLE vs GULDMSUSD vs PENDLEPOD vs PENDLE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.