NexSUSDAI vs PENDLE — price, size and safety, side by side
SUSDAI (Arbitrum) vs PENDLE (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-15.
SUSDAI vs PENDLE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-11-15T15:15:30
| SUSDAI | PENDLE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.12 | $1.44 |
| Market cap | $361.36M | $290.30M |
| 24h volume | $5.64M all venues | $52.48M all venues |
| Liquidity | $9.84M | $2.57M |
| FDV | $246.06M | $24.57M |
| Holders | 3,702 | 70,319 |
| Age (days) | 448 | 1,311 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- SUSDAI measures ~3.8× the liquidity of PENDLE
- PENDLE measures ~9.3× the 24h volume of SUSDAI
- PENDLE measures ~19× the holder count of SUSDAI
- over the shared window SUSDAI moved +0.95% while PENDLE moved −47.5%
What the data says
SUSDAI
SUSDAI is the staked wrapper of USDai — the yield-bearing form of a dollar token issued against AI-infrastructure financing — trading on Arbitrum at 0x0b2b2b2076d95dda7817e785989fe353fe955ef9. The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $9.8 million of tracked pool liquidity, the deepest single line item in this slice of the index.
What the numbers say: roughly seven months of trading history behind it, about $2.2 million of 24-hour volume against that liquidity base — a turnover ratio near 12%, the shape of a yield instrument held rather than churned. The ~$1.11 print against a $1-asset wrapper is consistent with accrued staking yield rather than a broken peg, though the snapshot alone cannot separate the two.
PENDLE
PENDLE on Arbitrum at 0x0c880f6761f1af8d9aa9c466984b80dab9a8c9e8 is the bridged deployment of the yield-tokenization protocol's token — the asset behind the principal-and-yield-splitting market that turned fixed yield into a DeFi primitive. The November 6, 2026 snapshot prices the Arbitrum-local supply of 14.6 million units at $24.6 million fully diluted, against an asset-wide $290.3 million market cap.
$2.6 million of tracked pool depth on this chain is thin measured the way the depth flag measures — against the asset-wide figure — but functional: $632.8 thousand of 24-hour volume moves through it. The 1,293-day record belongs to a token whose liquidity genuinely spans chains, with Ethereum holding the canonical supply and Arbitrum holding the routed share, so the local book is a window on the market rather than the market itself.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SUSDAI or PENDLE?
By tracked market cap: SUSDAI (Arbitrum) measures $361.36M and PENDLE (Arbitrum) measures $290.30M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SUSDAI or PENDLE?
On the contract checks we publish: SUSDAI (Arbitrum) grades B and PENDLE (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SUSDAI and PENDLE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-11-15T15:15:30, the measured snapshots show SUSDAI at +0.95% and PENDLE at −47.5%.
More comparisons
USDTB vs SUSDAISUSDAI vs SKYSUSDAI vs KBTCSUSDAI vs USDCARB vs PENDLEPENDLE vs PENGUPENDLE vs SHIBPENDLE vs CBETH
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-11-15T15:15:30; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.