HostSLVX vs JUICED — price, size and safety, side by side
SLVX (Solana) vs JUICED (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
SLVX vs JUICED — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| SLVX | JUICED | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $55.50 | $1.04 |
| Market cap | $9.08M | $51.57M |
| 24h volume | $6.21 | $2.11M |
| Liquidity | $0.4795 | — |
| FDV | $9.08M | $51.57M |
| Holders | 302 | 3,660 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- JUICED measures ~5.7× the market cap of SLVX
- JUICED measures ~338,947× the 24h volume of SLVX
- JUICED measures ~12× the holder count of SLVX
- over the shared window SLVX moved −7.59% while JUICED moved +0.27%
What the data says
SLVX
SLVX — "iShares Silver Trust xStock" on Solana, mint XsxAd6okt8y1RRK6gNg7iJaqiWNiq5Md5EDf3ZrF2dm — is a claimed tokenized SLV — the world's biggest silver ETF — at $9.08 million across 302 holders — with a 63.5% dev position on $0.48 of listed liquidity.
The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows a 163.6k-unit supply at $58.57 — tracking SLV's real price zone — while the dev holds ~$6.1M. Sixty-three cents of liquidity against a $9.58M cap is a paper valuation. Mint/freeze unreported.
JUICED
JUICED is the page in this cohort where honesty about limits matters most, so it leads with them: beyond the name its metadata carries, this token doesn't come with a public story our read can verify, and this page won't invent one. What the chain shows at mint 7GxATsNMnaC88vdwd2t3mwrFuQwwGvmYPrUQ4D6FotXk, per NexFlow's September 26, 2026 snapshot: roughly $51.6 million of represented value held by 3,660 wallets, a freeze authority that reads revoked, and the value-equals-pool signature that characterizes receipt tokens — staking or yield-pool shares whose worth tracks deposits — rather than free-floating traded assets.
That signature shapes how to read everything else. A receipt token's supply expands and contracts with its pool by design, so "can supply grow?" has the same answer as for every liquid-staking token this site grades: yes, mechanically, as the product operating — with the freeze-authority check (passed here) being the one that actually protects holders. The nearly four thousand wallets holding it imply a real user base for whatever the underlying product is, not a treasury parked in a wrapper.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SLVX or JUICED?
By tracked market cap: SLVX (Solana) measures $9.08M and JUICED (Solana) measures $51.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SLVX or JUICED?
On the contract checks we publish: SLVX (Solana) grades C and JUICED (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SLVX and JUICED performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show SLVX at −7.59% and JUICED at +0.27%.
More comparisons
SLVX vs CLAUDESLVX vs MCATSLVX vs AXSOLSLVX vs BBSOLJUICED vs MCATJUICED vs AXSOLJUICED vs BBSOLJUICED vs BNSOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.