HostJUICED vs MCAT — price, size and safety, side by side
JUICED (Solana) vs MCAT (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
JUICED vs MCAT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| JUICED | MCAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.04 | $0.7406 |
| Market cap | $51.57M | $55.97M |
| 24h volume | $2.11M | $3.42M |
| Liquidity | — | $0.00 |
| FDV | $51.57M | $595.07M |
| Holders | 3,660 | 23,117 |
| Age (days) | — | 11 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- MCAT measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of JUICED
- MCAT measures ~6.3× the holder count of JUICED
- over the shared window JUICED moved +0.13% while MCAT moved +20.0%
What the data says
JUICED
JUICED is the page in this cohort where honesty about limits matters most, so it leads with them: beyond the name its metadata carries, this token doesn't come with a public story our read can verify, and this page won't invent one. What the chain shows at mint 7GxATsNMnaC88vdwd2t3mwrFuQwwGvmYPrUQ4D6FotXk, per NexFlow's September 26, 2026 snapshot: roughly $51.6 million of represented value held by 3,660 wallets, a freeze authority that reads revoked, and the value-equals-pool signature that characterizes receipt tokens — staking or yield-pool shares whose worth tracks deposits — rather than free-floating traded assets.
That signature shapes how to read everything else. A receipt token's supply expands and contracts with its pool by design, so "can supply grow?" has the same answer as for every liquid-staking token this site grades: yes, mechanically, as the product operating — with the freeze-authority check (passed here) being the one that actually protects holders. The nearly four thousand wallets holding it imply a real user base for whatever the underlying product is, not a treasury parked in a wrapper.
MCAT
MCAT — Marscat Token at 0xd69a4b260ef021ccd4e1c5f5a4fb522b032ce831 — is eleven days old on BNB Chain with 23,117 holders at the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The contract checks clean: it cannot mint new supply, cannot pause or blacklist transfers, source is verified, and the creator wallet holds under 0.01%. The market is the unresolved half — tracked liquidity reads effectively zero in this pass even though the tape shows millions of dollars of daily volume, which usually means the pool sits somewhere the tracker's coverage missed rather than nowhere. The ten largest wallets hold about 93.8% of supply.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JUICED or MCAT?
By tracked market cap: JUICED (Solana) measures $51.57M and MCAT (BNB Chain) measures $55.97M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JUICED or MCAT?
On the contract checks we publish: JUICED (Solana) grades A and MCAT (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JUICED and MCAT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show JUICED at +0.13% and MCAT at +20.0%.
More comparisons
JUICED vs AXSOLJUICED vs BBSOLJUICED vs BNSOLJUICED vs BONKSOLMCAT vs AXSOLMCAT vs BBSOLMCAT vs BNSOLMCAT vs BONKSOL
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.