HostSHIB vs UST — price, size and safety, side by side
SHIB (Ethereum) vs UST (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
SHIB vs UST — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| SHIB | UST | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.000005989 | $0.005974 |
| Market cap | $3.38B | $79.67K |
| 24h volume | $155.37K | $2.06K |
| Liquidity | $2.48M | $68.14K |
| FDV | $5.74B | $88.12K |
| Holders | 1,697,362 | 7,230 |
| Age (days) | — | 1,705 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- SHIB measures ~42,456× the market cap of UST
- SHIB measures ~36× the liquidity of UST
- SHIB measures ~75× the 24h volume of UST
- SHIB measures ~235× the holder count of UST
What the data says
SHIB
SHIBA INU at 0x95ad61b0a150d79219dcf64e1e6cc01f0b64c4ce is the original self-styled dogecoin killer on Ethereum and one of the widest-held tokens anywhere: 1,697,362 wallets at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. This page's job is less to explain a meme than to read a very large, very old market structure honestly.
The contract side is as clean as a token gets: it cannot mint new supply, cannot pause or blacklist transfers, the source is verified, and it sits on a major security registry's trust list. The creator wallet holds under 0.01% of supply. The honest caveat is market-side, not contract-side: $2.5 million of tracked liquidity against a $3.4 billion market cap is large in dollars but thin against the token's own size — size an exit against the pool, not the cap. The ten largest wallets hold about 64% of supply, heavy even for a top-cap meme.
UST
UST on Avalanche at 0x260bbf5698121eb85e7a74f2e45e16ce762ebe11 — "Axelar Wrapped UST" — is a remnant of the TerraUSD collapse carried over a bridge: what was once the dollar-pegged stablecoin now trades around $0.006, kept alive as a speculative claim on nothing in particular.
At the September 27, 2026 snapshot the book reads like an artifact rather than a market: $68 thousand of liquidity against a $80 thousand cap — a pool bigger than the cap, because the price already found its floor — across 1,705 days of history and a few thousand dollars of daily volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the wrapper's levers are unverified.
FAQ
Which is bigger, SHIB or UST?
By tracked market cap: SHIB (Ethereum) measures $3.38B and UST (Avalanche) measures $79.67K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, SHIB or UST?
On the contract checks we publish: SHIB (Ethereum) grades A and UST (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have SHIB and UST performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show SHIB at +4.33% and UST at +2.17%.
More comparisons
SHIB vs 龙虾SURPLUS vs SHIBADI vs SHIBSHIB vs SKHYKURUMI vs USTUST vs XAUT0UST vs PAXUST vs CLUDE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.