HostRETH vs PEAR — price, size and safety, side by side
RETH (Ethereum) vs PEAR (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
RETH vs PEAR — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RETH | PEAR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.14K | $0.03808 |
| Market cap | $1.00B | $19.57M |
| 24h volume | $1.27M | $90.37K |
| Liquidity | $11.93M | $714.58K |
| FDV | $1.00B | $32.45M |
| Holders | 21,817 | 2,400 |
| Age (days) | 1,492 | 725 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- RETH measures ~51× the market cap of PEAR
- RETH measures ~17× the liquidity of PEAR
- RETH measures ~14× the 24h volume of PEAR
- RETH measures ~9.1× the holder count of PEAR
- over the shared window RETH moved −0.82% while PEAR moved +9.20%
What the data says
RETH
rETH is Rocket Pool's liquid staking receipt — the decentralized alternative in the ETH-staking market: anyone can run a Rocket Pool "minipool" validator with 8 ETH plus RPL collateral, and rETH appreciates against ETH as rewards accrue. The contract 0xae78736cd615f374d3085123a210448e74fc6393 is the canonical deployment; our September 26, 2026 read shows $11.9 million of tracked pool liquidity, with rETH's deeper venues spread across the wider DeFi stack.
The honest framing: rETH's pitch is credible neutrality — a permissionless operator set rather than one company's validators — and the trade-off is the usual one: a smaller, more fragmented liquidity surface than stETH and its own smart-contract surface (minipool mechanics, oracle DAO) instead of a single issuer's operations. The wrapper price is not ETH's price — it floats on its own exchange rate and has traded at discounts in stress.
PEAR
PEAR at 0x3212dc0f8c834e4de893532d27cc9b6001684db0 is an Arbitrum asset 725 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $19.6 million market cap with a $32.5 million fully-diluted figure on 852.2 million units showing the emission still ahead.
The book is workable for the cap: $714.6 thousand of tracked depth on $58.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — a pool that clears ordinary size and a quiet tape that mostly holds. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption here.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RETH or PEAR?
By tracked market cap: RETH (Ethereum) measures $1.00B and PEAR (Arbitrum) measures $19.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RETH or PEAR?
On the contract checks we publish: RETH (Ethereum) grades B and PEAR (Arbitrum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RETH and PEAR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RETH at −0.82% and PEAR at +9.20%.
More comparisons
DIEM vs RETHUSDG vs RETHRETH vs SYRUPUSDCRETH vs WETHPEAR vs GMEPEAR vs DESPXAPEAR vs LFIAVA vs PEAR
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.