HostRETH vs SYRUPUSDC — price, size and safety, side by side
RETH (Ethereum) vs SYRUPUSDC (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-27.
RETH vs SYRUPUSDC — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| RETH | SYRUPUSDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.14K | $1.18 |
| Market cap | $1.00B | $98.76M |
| 24h volume | $1.27M | $481.98K |
| Liquidity | $11.93M | $11.21M |
| FDV | $1.00B | $98.76M |
| Holders | 21,817 | 3,757 |
| Age (days) | 1,492 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- RETH measures ~10× the market cap of SYRUPUSDC
- RETH measures ~2.6× the 24h volume of SYRUPUSDC
- RETH measures ~5.8× the holder count of SYRUPUSDC
- over the shared window RETH moved +7.01% while SYRUPUSDC moved +0.16%
What the data says
RETH
rETH is Rocket Pool's liquid staking receipt — the decentralized alternative in the ETH-staking market: anyone can run a Rocket Pool "minipool" validator with 8 ETH plus RPL collateral, and rETH appreciates against ETH as rewards accrue. The contract 0xae78736cd615f374d3085123a210448e74fc6393 is the canonical deployment; our September 26, 2026 read shows $11.9 million of tracked pool liquidity, with rETH's deeper venues spread across the wider DeFi stack.
The honest framing: rETH's pitch is credible neutrality — a permissionless operator set rather than one company's validators — and the trade-off is the usual one: a smaller, more fragmented liquidity surface than stETH and its own smart-contract surface (minipool mechanics, oracle DAO) instead of a single issuer's operations. The wrapper price is not ETH's price — it floats on its own exchange rate and has traded at discounts in stress.
SYRUPUSDC
Syrup USDC on Solana is Maple Finance's yield-bearing dollar bridged to this chain — the deposit token that earns institutional lending yield while circulating as a stable unit, one of the "your stablecoin pays you" class. The mint AvZZF1YaZDziPY2RCK4oJrRVrbN3mTD9NL24hPeaZeUj is the Solana deployment; our September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $11.2 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest mechanics: syrupUSDC's yield comes from Maple's lending book — real borrower demand paying real interest, which is a step up from incentive-printed yield — but it means the token's return is only as good as Maple's loan underwriting, and the bridged Solana form adds the bridge's custody between the holder and that book. The A grade covers the Solana contract state; the lending book is an off-chain fact.
FAQ
Which is bigger, RETH or SYRUPUSDC?
By tracked market cap: RETH (Ethereum) measures $1.00B and SYRUPUSDC (Solana) measures $98.76M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, RETH or SYRUPUSDC?
On the contract checks we publish: RETH (Ethereum) grades B and SYRUPUSDC (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have RETH and SYRUPUSDC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show RETH at +7.01% and SYRUPUSDC at +0.16%.
More comparisons
DIEM vs RETHUSDG vs RETHRETH vs WETHRETH vs MEWSYRUPUSDC vs WETHSYRUPUSDC vs MEWSYRUPUSDC vs USDTBSYRUPUSDC vs SKY
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.