HostR2 vs 牛马 — price, size and safety, side by side
R2 (BNB Chain) vs 牛马 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26T06:07:05.
R2 vs 牛马 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| R2 | 牛马 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.008519 | $0.002056 |
| Market cap | $1.78M | $2.02M |
| 24h volume | $4.11M | $3.01M |
| Liquidity | $124.34K | $109.50K |
| FDV | $17.07M | $2.02M |
| Holders | 5,955 | 8,984 |
| Age (days) | 4 | 3 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- 牛马 measures ~1.5× the holder count of R2
What the data says
R2
R² at 0x223a20e1b83aa3832e78d4b7b132df022e739222 is a four-day-old BNB Chain book — 4 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $1.8 million market cap against a $17.1 million fully-diluted figure on 1.0 billion units.
The launch tape is extreme even by BNB standards: $124.3 thousand of tracked depth on $4.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool turning over dozens of times a day, the profile of a routed launch book. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
牛马
牛马 at 0xb077ada375b5e416f15e8b8f6827dadfa53a7777 — a workhorse-slang name on a contract that ends in four sevens — is a three-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $2.0 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The launch book is deep for the float and the tape is hot: $109.5 thousand of tracked depth on $3.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool twenty-seven times daily on day three. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, R2 or 牛马?
By tracked market cap: R2 (BNB Chain) measures $1.78M and 牛马 (BNB Chain) measures $2.02M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, R2 or 牛马?
On the contract checks we publish: R2 (BNB Chain) grades B and 牛马 (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have R2 and 牛马 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show R2 at 0.00% and 牛马 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
URA vs R2MASK vs R2R2 vs TREMPDUPE vs R2ROUTER vs 牛马MOOBIFI vs 牛马牛马 vs FIGHTSPACEX vs 牛马
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.