HostROUTER vs 牛马 — price, size and safety, side by side
ROUTER (Solana) vs 牛马 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26T06:07:05.
ROUTER vs 牛马 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| ROUTER | 牛马 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.003018 | $0.002056 |
| Market cap | $3.30M | $2.02M |
| 24h volume | $426.05K | $3.01M |
| Liquidity | $109.92K | $109.50K |
| FDV | $3.30M | $2.02M |
| Holders | 1,557 | 8,984 |
| Age (days) | — | 3 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- ROUTER measures ~1.6× the market cap of 牛马
- 牛马 measures ~7.1× the 24h volume of ROUTER
- 牛马 measures ~5.8× the holder count of ROUTER
- over the shared window ROUTER moved −10.7% while 牛马 moved 0.00%
What the data says
ROUTER
ROUTER — Solrouter on Solana, mint 6SjVTj1VGwFSXn7wEjwFm77LvACeTqB7sQUebYKX8Ds5 — is the token of solrouter.com, a routing/aggregator-flavored product, caught mid-vertical: +52.1% on the day of the September 26, 2026 snapshot, ~$49 thousand of volume against $110 thousand of liquidity.
A +52% candle on near-pool-sized volume is an instrument being repriced fast — whatever drove it (a launch, a mention, a listing) arrived between snapshots. $3.3 million across 1,557 holders is ~$1,475 of cap per wallet — a heavy file getting heavier on green.
牛马
牛马 at 0xb077ada375b5e416f15e8b8f6827dadfa53a7777 — a workhorse-slang name on a contract that ends in four sevens — is a three-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $2.0 million market cap across a 1.0 billion supply at the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
The launch book is deep for the float and the tape is hot: $109.5 thousand of tracked depth on $3.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool twenty-seven times daily on day three. No holder distribution and no contract-level controls were assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ROUTER or 牛马?
By tracked market cap: ROUTER (Solana) measures $3.30M and 牛马 (BNB Chain) measures $2.02M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ROUTER or 牛马?
On the contract checks we publish: ROUTER (Solana) grades A and 牛马 (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ROUTER and 牛马 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show ROUTER at −10.7% and 牛马 at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MOOBIFI vs ROUTERSPACEX vs ROUTERPOS vs ROUTERSAND vs ROUTERMOOBIFI vs 牛马牛马 vs FIGHTSPACEX vs 牛马POS vs 牛马
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.