HostQUID vs O — price, size and safety, side by side
QUID (Base) vs O (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
QUID vs O — normalized performance, 2026-09-18T04:43:53 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| QUID | O | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.07183 | $0.5434 |
| Market cap | $10.28M | $86.94M |
| 24h volume | $534.41K | $289.44K |
| Liquidity | $436.06K | $384.13K |
| FDV | $71.83M | $543.35M |
| Holders | 14,990 | 14,625 |
| Age (days) | 16 | 96 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- O measures ~8.5× the market cap of QUID
- QUID measures ~1.8× the 24h volume of O
- over the shared window QUID moved +11.1% while O moved −0.34%
What the data says
QUID
QUID — trading as "Squid" on Base, 0x1a44233fae8d50f1aeb3a5d58dd426ff4814cb53 — carries the single most infamous name in token history. The original SQUID, launched around the Squid Game series in late 2021, became the canonical honeypot: it rocketed thousands of percent while its contract quietly blocked every sell, then collapsed to zero in minutes when the deployer exited.
This contract is not that token — different chain, different address, 16 days tracked in the September 27, 2026 snapshot with $436 thousand of liquidity and roughly $14.4 million of daily volume. But the name choice is itself a data point: a deployer who picks the most famous scam ticker in crypto is either making an ironic joke or fishing for exactly the buyers the joke attracts. Neither possibility says the contract is malicious — the sell-side check is what settles that, and the honeypot test is the required first step on this page more than almost any other.
O
O is the token of o1.exchange — a small-cap exchange venue play on Base — at contract 0x182fa643e5f29d5eca75e7b9cf9336a3fe4620b2, with $384 thousand of tracked pool liquidity as of September 27, 2026.
The honest note: a one-letter ticker is the single most collision-prone symbol class there is — "O" means different tokens on different chains and none of them are the famous ones. Everything on this page is about this specific Base contract; do not generalize it to any other "O" you meet elsewhere.
FAQ
Which is bigger, QUID or O?
By tracked market cap: QUID (Base) measures $10.28M and O (Base) measures $86.94M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, QUID or O?
On the contract checks we publish: QUID (Base) grades A and O (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have QUID and O performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-18T04:43:53 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show QUID at +11.1% and O at −0.34%.
More comparisons
QUID vs GMEXAPXUSD vs QUIDVOLLAR vs QUIDUVM vs QUIDGEOD vs OXHYPE vs OO vs KLEDO vs AUSD
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-18T04:43:53→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.