HostPST vs PENDLE — price, size and safety, side by side
PST (Solana) vs PENDLE (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-27 / 2026-10-27.
PST vs PENDLE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-27T12:16:05
| PST | PENDLE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.14 | $1.93 |
| Market cap | $383.37M | $366.60M |
| 24h volume | $1.15M DEX | $272.93K DEX |
| Liquidity | $3.78M | $3.11M |
| FDV | $383.37M | $30.78M |
| Holders | 4,155 | 70,319 |
| Age (days) | — | 1,311 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- PST measures ~4.2× the 24h volume of PENDLE
- PENDLE measures ~17× the holder count of PST
- over the shared window PST moved +0.69% while PENDLE moved −29.7%
What the data says
PST
PST is PayFi's strategy token — a USDC-denominated position that routes deposits into payment-finance yield (the spread on moving money across borders and settlement rails), another real-world-cashflow token in the RWA mold. The mint 59obFNBzyTBGowrkif5uK7ojS58vsuWz3ZCvg6tfZAGw is the Solana deployment; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $3.8 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest mechanics: payment-finance yield is real commercial activity — remittance float, settlement timing spreads — so PST's return isn't printed from token emissions; it's also an off-chain book the chain can't verify, and the token is ultimately a claim on PayFi's operation of that book. The A grade is a contract verdict; the strategy is a counterparty.
PENDLE
PENDLE on Arbitrum at 0x0c880f6761f1af8d9aa9c466984b80dab9a8c9e8 is the bridged deployment of the yield-tokenization protocol's token — the asset behind the principal-and-yield-splitting market that turned fixed yield into a DeFi primitive. The October 9, 2026 snapshot prices the Arbitrum-local supply of 14.6 million units at $30.8 million fully diluted, against an asset-wide $366.6 million market cap.
$3.1 million of tracked pool depth on this chain is thin measured the way the depth flag measures — against the asset-wide figure — but functional: $632.8 thousand of 24-hour volume moves through it. The 1,293-day record belongs to a token whose liquidity genuinely spans chains, with Ethereum holding the canonical supply and Arbitrum holding the routed share, so the local book is a window on the market rather than the market itself.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PST or PENDLE?
By tracked market cap: PST (Solana) measures $383.37M and PENDLE (Arbitrum) measures $366.60M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PST or PENDLE?
On the contract checks we publish: PST (Solana) grades A and PENDLE (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PST and PENDLE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-27T12:16:05, the measured snapshots show PST at +0.69% and PENDLE at −29.7%.
More comparisons
PST vs DRVPST vs ASTERPST vs XRPPST vs USD0PENDLE vs ARBPENDLE vs CBETHUSD0 vs PENDLEPENDLE vs PRIME
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-27T12:16:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.