HostUSD0++ vs PENDLE — price, size and safety, side by side
USD0++ (Ethereum) vs PENDLE (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-26 / 2026-10-27.
USD0++ vs PENDLE — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-26T21:16:29
| USD0++ | PENDLE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.98 | $1.93 |
| Market cap | — | $366.60M |
| 24h volume | $4.15 DEX | $272.93K DEX |
| Liquidity | $5.33M | $3.11M |
| FDV | $504.34M | $30.78M |
| Holders | 2,713 | 70,319 |
| Age (days) | 528 | 1,311 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- USD0++ measures ~1.7× the liquidity of PENDLE
- PENDLE measures ~65,762× the 24h volume of USD0++
- PENDLE measures ~26× the holder count of USD0++
- over the shared window USD0++ moved −0.06% while PENDLE moved −29.2%
What the data says
USD0++
USD0++ is Usual Protocol's bonded T-bill — the yield-bearing form of its USD0 stablecoin, structured as a liquid bond that locks the underlying for a term and pays boosted yield for the commitment. The deployment 0x35d8949372d46b7a3d5a56006ae77b215fc69bc0 is the mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $5.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: the "++" is duration — USD0++ trades instant redeemability for a locked term in exchange for protocol yield, which means it can and does trade below the dollar value of the USD0 inside it when the market marks that lock-up at a discount. A holder isn't buying a stablecoin; they're buying a bond with a market price.
PENDLE
PENDLE on Arbitrum at 0x0c880f6761f1af8d9aa9c466984b80dab9a8c9e8 is the bridged deployment of the yield-tokenization protocol's token — the asset behind the principal-and-yield-splitting market that turned fixed yield into a DeFi primitive. The October 9, 2026 snapshot prices the Arbitrum-local supply of 14.6 million units at $30.8 million fully diluted, against an asset-wide $366.6 million market cap.
$3.1 million of tracked pool depth on this chain is thin measured the way the depth flag measures — against the asset-wide figure — but functional: $632.8 thousand of 24-hour volume moves through it. The 1,293-day record belongs to a token whose liquidity genuinely spans chains, with Ethereum holding the canonical supply and Arbitrum holding the routed share, so the local book is a window on the market rather than the market itself.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USD0++ or PENDLE?
By tracked market cap: USD0++ (Ethereum) measures — and PENDLE (Arbitrum) measures $366.60M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USD0++ or PENDLE?
On the contract checks we publish: USD0++ (Ethereum) grades B and PENDLE (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USD0++ and PENDLE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-26T21:16:29, the measured snapshots show USD0++ at −0.06% and PENDLE at −29.2%.
More comparisons
USD0++ vs PENGUJUP vs USD0++EUROC vs USD0++USD0++ vs ELEVATEPENDLE vs ARBPENDLE vs CBETHPENDLE vs PRIMEPENDLE vs USDT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-26T21:16:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.