HostPOL vs ZC — price, size and safety, side by side
POL (Ethereum) vs ZC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-12 / 2026-11-12.
POL vs ZC — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-11-12T21:16:22
| POL | ZC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.08621 | $0.00003795 |
| Market cap | $993.60M | $49.04K |
| 24h volume | $54.72M all venues | $1.03M all venues |
| Liquidity | $48.54K | $29.37K |
| FDV | $993.60M | $49.98K |
| Holders | 105,309 | 5,596 |
| Age (days) | 1,060 | 6 |
| Safety grade | E | A |
Where they differ
- POL measures ~20,261× the market cap of ZC
- POL measures ~1.7× the liquidity of ZC
- POL measures ~53× the 24h volume of ZC
- POL measures ~19× the holder count of ZC
- over the shared window POL moved −20.7% while ZC moved −99.8%
What the data says
POL
POL — 0x455e53cbb86018ac2b8092fdcd39d8444affc3f6 — is the Polygon Ecosystem Token, the successor asset that replaced MATIC as Polygon's gas and staking token in the network's 2024 upgrade.
The November 6, 2026 snapshot reads a $993.6 million market cap, fully circulating against an equal FDV, with 105,309 holders. Tracked on-chain depth runs $48.5 thousand — POL's liquidity is overwhelmingly on centralized venues and its home chain, not the pools this ledger prices. The day prints -1.6%.
ZC
There's a lot to like about how ZC's contract is set up. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Neither lever existing is the main reason ZC's 90/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
By the numbers, ZC is showing workable liquidity of $326.97K, 5,596 holders and a brand-new record at 6 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $17.94M, the $326.97K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 5,596-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just 0.73% of ZC as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, POL or ZC?
By tracked market cap: POL (Ethereum) measures $993.60M and ZC (Ethereum) measures $49.04K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, POL or ZC?
On the contract checks we publish: POL (Ethereum) grades E and ZC (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have POL and ZC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-11-12T21:16:22, the measured snapshots show POL at −20.7% and ZC at −99.8%.
More comparisons
TSAT vs POLUNI vs POLLINK.E vs POLUSDE vs POLZC vs CAKEZC vs WEETHTSAT vs ZCZC vs RETH
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-11-12T21:16:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.