Open app

LINK.E vs POL — price, size and safety, side by side

LINK.E (Avalanche) vs POL (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-31 / 2026-10-30.

LINK.EC

$11.51
Chainlink Token on Avalanche
Trade LINK.E
vs

POLE

$0.09202
Polygon Ecosystem Token on Ethereum
Trade POL

LINK.E vs POL — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-10-30T18:16:02

100 — shared start
LINK.E −21.8%  ·  POL −23.2% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
LINK.EPOL
Price$11.51$0.09202
Market cap$9.64B$1.05B
24h volume$7.12K DEX$10.44K DEX
Liquidity$89.47K$49.75K
FDV$4.65M$1.05B
Holders13,087105,309
Age (days)1,1211,060
Safety gradeCE

Where they differ

What the data says

LINK.E

LINK.E at 0x5947bb275c521040051d82396192181b413227a3 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of Chainlink's token — the ".e" suffix marking the older bridge's claim — 1,121 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $9.6 billion market cap dwarfs the $4.7 million fully-diluted figure priced on 365.7 thousand local units.

The local book is thin for the headline: $89.5 thousand of tracked depth on $72.6 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.

Full LINK.E safety read →

POL

POL — 0x455e53cbb86018ac2b8092fdcd39d8444affc3f6 — is the Polygon Ecosystem Token, the successor asset that replaced MATIC as Polygon's gas and staking token in the network's 2024 upgrade.

The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $1.1 billion market cap, fully circulating against an equal FDV, with 105,309 holders. Tracked on-chain depth runs $49.8 thousand — POL's liquidity is overwhelmingly on centralized venues and its home chain, not the pools this ledger prices. The day prints -1.6%.

Full POL safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, LINK.E or POL?

By tracked market cap: LINK.E (Avalanche) measures $9.64B and POL (Ethereum) measures $1.05B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, LINK.E or POL?

On the contract checks we publish: LINK.E (Avalanche) grades C and POL (Ethereum) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have LINK.E and POL performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-10-30T18:16:02, the measured snapshots show LINK.E at −21.8% and POL at −23.2%.

More comparisons

LDO vs LINK.ELINK.E vs UNILINK.E vs USDEAVAX vs LINK.ETSAT vs POLUSDE vs POLUNI vs POLPOL vs CAKE

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-10-30T18:16:02; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.