HostPENDLE vs EUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
PENDLE (Arbitrum) vs EUSD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-31 / 2026-10-30.
PENDLE vs EUSD — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-30T18:16:02
| PENDLE | EUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.86 | $0.9913 |
| Market cap | $366.60M | $23.35M |
| 24h volume | $272.93K DEX | $1.98M DEX |
| Liquidity | $3.11M | $1.10M |
| FDV | $30.78M | $17.70M |
| Holders | 70,319 | 25,072 |
| Age (days) | 1,311 | 853 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- PENDLE measures ~16× the market cap of EUSD
- PENDLE measures ~2.8× the liquidity of EUSD
- EUSD measures ~7.2× the 24h volume of PENDLE
- PENDLE measures ~2.8× the holder count of EUSD
- over the shared window PENDLE moved −28.3% while EUSD moved −0.54%
What the data says
PENDLE
PENDLE on Arbitrum at 0x0c880f6761f1af8d9aa9c466984b80dab9a8c9e8 is the bridged deployment of the yield-tokenization protocol's token — the asset behind the principal-and-yield-splitting market that turned fixed yield into a DeFi primitive. The October 9, 2026 snapshot prices the Arbitrum-local supply of 14.6 million units at $30.8 million fully diluted, against an asset-wide $366.6 million market cap.
$3.1 million of tracked pool depth on this chain is thin measured the way the depth flag measures — against the asset-wide figure — but functional: $632.8 thousand of 24-hour volume moves through it. The 1,293-day record belongs to a token whose liquidity genuinely spans chains, with Ethereum holding the canonical supply and Arbitrum holding the routed share, so the local book is a window on the market rather than the market itself.
EUSD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on EUSD to flag. The mint function on EUSD's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why EUSD is at C (55/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On liquidity and holders, EUSD shows $1.10M of on-chain liquidity, 25,072 holders and 853 days old as of 2026-10-09. Set the $1.10M of depth beside roughly $23.35M in market cap and it reads as moderate: comfortable for everyday trades, less so for size that begins to rival the pool itself. A 25,072-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, PENDLE or EUSD?
By tracked market cap: PENDLE (Arbitrum) measures $366.60M and EUSD (Base) measures $23.35M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, PENDLE or EUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: PENDLE (Arbitrum) grades B and EUSD (Base) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have PENDLE and EUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-30T18:16:02, the measured snapshots show PENDLE at −28.3% and EUSD at −0.54%.
More comparisons
PENDLE vs ARBPENDLE vs CBETHUSD0 vs PENDLEPENDLE vs PRIMEEUSD vs TBTCQNT vs EUSDUSDT0 vs EUSDEUSD vs AKE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-30T18:16:02; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.