HostORCLX vs GMT — price, size and safety, side by side
ORCLX (Solana) vs GMT (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
ORCLX vs GMT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| ORCLX | GMT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $137.75 | $0.008854 |
| Market cap | $12.81M | $25.94M |
| 24h volume | $1.52K | $30.20K |
| Liquidity | $3.05K | $621.92K |
| FDV | $12.81M | $16.23M |
| Holders | 1,079 | 46,298 |
| Age (days) | — | 963 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- GMT measures ~2.0× the market cap of ORCLX
- GMT measures ~204× the liquidity of ORCLX
- GMT measures ~20× the 24h volume of ORCLX
- GMT measures ~43× the holder count of ORCLX
- over the shared window ORCLX moved −7.87% while GMT moved +6.22%
What the data says
ORCLX
ORCLX — "Oracle xStock" on Solana, mint XsjFwUPiLofddX5cWFHW35GCbXcSu1BCUGfxoQAQjeL — is a claimed tokenized Oracle at $13 million — with a flagged 59.4% dev-wallet position across 1,079 holders in the September 26, 2026 snapshot.
A 91.3k-unit supply at $142.92 tracks Oracle's real price zone, but the dev wallet holds ~$7.75M of the cap with no backing attestation. ~$1.6 thousand of daily volume on $3 thousand is a modest book. Mint/freeze unreported.
GMT
GMT at 0x714db550b574b3e927af3d93e26127d15721d4c2 — Green Metaverse Token — is STEPN's governance asset in bridged Polygon form, the move-to-earn token that peaked with the app cycle and settled into the long tail. The September 26, 2026 snapshot prices a $25.9 million market cap against a $16.2 million fully-diluted read of the local float of 2.0 billion units.
The book is modest and honest: $621.9 thousand of tracked depth is workable for the size, on $30.2 thousand of 24-hour volume — a consumer-app token's steady-state tape, far off its cycle peak but still trading real size against its pools. The deployment is 963 days into this index's record.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ORCLX or GMT?
By tracked market cap: ORCLX (Solana) measures $12.81M and GMT (Polygon) measures $25.94M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ORCLX or GMT?
On the contract checks we publish: ORCLX (Solana) grades C and GMT (Polygon) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ORCLX and GMT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show ORCLX at −7.87% and GMT at +6.22%.
More comparisons
ORCLX vs MRVLXORCLX vs SONICATTN vs ORCLXORCLX vs EARNAUSDCES vs GMTLAPTOP vs GMTGMT vs APXUSDJTO vs GMT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.