HostNEEGY vs FATGF — price, size and safety, side by side
NEEGY (Solana) vs FATGF (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
NEEGY vs FATGF — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| NEEGY | FATGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00007507 | $0.00008891 |
| Market cap | $80.93K | $88.00K |
| 24h volume | $14.34K | $1.25K |
| Liquidity | $29.71K | $29.49K |
| FDV | $80.93K | $88.00K |
| Holders | 5,322 | 2,426 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- NEEGY measures ~11× the 24h volume of FATGF
- NEEGY measures ~2.2× the holder count of FATGF
- over the shared window NEEGY moved −55.2% while FATGF moved +4.23%
What the data says
NEEGY
Right at the foundation, NEEGY does both of the things you'd hope to see. With minting permanently disabled, the float simply can't be inflated, and the freeze power has been given up too, keeping your ability to sell fully open. With the contract side handled, everything left to think about is ordinary market risk (85/100, 2026-09-26).
On the trading data, NEEGY shows a $29.71K pool and 5,322 wallets holding as of 2026-09-26. Against roughly $80.93K in market cap, the $29.71K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. 5,322 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure.
FATGF
FATGF — "FATGF" on Solana, mint 4y9E3tJpGNzRr1592oWTPECgyp2VDSc1Bf3DqAm5FZsK — is one of Solana's older memes (@FATGFSol) — a token that survived from an earlier cycle with 2,426 wallets still on file.
The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $88 thousand on a $24.2 thousand pool — a third of the cap in liquidity — on ~$746 of daily volume. Mint and freeze are both revoked.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NEEGY or FATGF?
By tracked market cap: NEEGY (Solana) measures $80.93K and FATGF (Solana) measures $88.00K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NEEGY or FATGF?
On the contract checks we publish: NEEGY (Solana) grades A and FATGF (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NEEGY and FATGF performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show NEEGY at −55.2% and FATGF at +4.23%.
More comparisons
POCHITA vs NEEGY. vs NEEGYNEEGY vs FULLSENDNEEGY vs VIBESVIBES vs FATGFFULLSEND vs FATGFFATGF vs BORKFATGF vs SPSN
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.