Open app

FULLSEND vs FATGF — price, size and safety, side by side

FULLSEND (Solana) vs FATGF (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.

FULLSENDA

$0.00009746
Fullsend Community Coin on Solana
Trade FULLSEND
vs

FATGFA

$0.00008891
FATGF on Solana
Trade FATGF

FULLSEND vs FATGF — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06

100 — shared start
FULLSEND +17.0%  ·  FATGF +4.23% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
FULLSENDFATGF
Price$0.00009746$0.00008891
Market cap$93.27K$88.00K
24h volume$4.23$1.25K
Liquidity$29.58K$29.49K
FDV$93.27K$88.00K
Holders10,1322,426
Safety gradeAA

Where they differ

What the data says

FULLSEND

FULLSEND — "Fullsend Community Coin" on Solana, mint AshG5mHt4y4etsjhKFb2wA2rq1XZxKks1EPzcuXwpump — is a claimant on the Full Send brand: the Nelk Boys' lifestyle empire, one of YouTube's biggest brands, which has its own crypto history (the Full Send NFT collection and the Happy Dad brand). The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $93 thousand across 10,132 holders.

Ten thousand wallets is a wide file — the Full Send brand pulled real distribution. The row's "website" field is a Solscan transaction link — an unusual provenance pointer, more receipt than site. Volume/change fields are empty on this snapshot — a book the indexer couldn't read.

Full FULLSEND safety read →

FATGF

FATGF — "FATGF" on Solana, mint 4y9E3tJpGNzRr1592oWTPECgyp2VDSc1Bf3DqAm5FZsK — is one of Solana's older memes (@FATGFSol) — a token that survived from an earlier cycle with 2,426 wallets still on file.

The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $88 thousand on a $24.2 thousand pool — a third of the cap in liquidity — on ~$746 of daily volume. Mint and freeze are both revoked.

Full FATGF safety read →

FAQ

Which is bigger, FULLSEND or FATGF?

By tracked market cap: FULLSEND (Solana) measures $93.27K and FATGF (Solana) measures $88.00K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, FULLSEND or FATGF?

On the contract checks we publish: FULLSEND (Solana) grades A and FATGF (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have FULLSEND and FATGF performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show FULLSEND at +17.0% and FATGF at +4.23%.

More comparisons

FULLSEND vs VIBESNEEGY vs FULLSENDPOCHITA vs FULLSENDFULLSEND vs BORKVIBES vs FATGFFATGF vs BORKFATGF vs SPSNFATGF vs ZODS

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.