HostFULLSEND vs VIBES — price, size and safety, side by side
FULLSEND (Solana) vs VIBES (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
FULLSEND vs VIBES — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| FULLSEND | VIBES | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00009746 | $0.00005268 |
| Market cap | $93.27K | $54.91K |
| 24h volume | $4.23 | $245.57 |
| Liquidity | $29.58K | $29.55K |
| FDV | $93.27K | $54.91K |
| Holders | 10,132 | 2,615 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- FULLSEND measures ~1.7× the market cap of VIBES
- VIBES measures ~58× the 24h volume of FULLSEND
- FULLSEND measures ~3.9× the holder count of VIBES
- over the shared window FULLSEND moved +17.0% while VIBES moved −20.8%
What the data says
FULLSEND
FULLSEND — "Fullsend Community Coin" on Solana, mint AshG5mHt4y4etsjhKFb2wA2rq1XZxKks1EPzcuXwpump — is a claimant on the Full Send brand: the Nelk Boys' lifestyle empire, one of YouTube's biggest brands, which has its own crypto history (the Full Send NFT collection and the Happy Dad brand). The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $93 thousand across 10,132 holders.
Ten thousand wallets is a wide file — the Full Send brand pulled real distribution. The row's "website" field is a Solscan transaction link — an unusual provenance pointer, more receipt than site. Volume/change fields are empty on this snapshot — a book the indexer couldn't read.
VIBES
VIBES — "vibe shift" on Solana, mint Ed1yisBEAo8UXToSswvVFgzyJKpF48HEdq5kvz2zpump — is a pump.fun file named for the "vibe shift" meme, holding 2,615 wallets on a $54.9 thousand cap.
Mint and freeze are both revoked on a ~$27 thousand pool.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FULLSEND or VIBES?
By tracked market cap: FULLSEND (Solana) measures $93.27K and VIBES (Solana) measures $54.91K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FULLSEND or VIBES?
On the contract checks we publish: FULLSEND (Solana) grades A and VIBES (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FULLSEND and VIBES performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show FULLSEND at +17.0% and VIBES at −20.8%.
More comparisons
FULLSEND vs FATGFNEEGY vs FULLSENDPOCHITA vs FULLSENDFULLSEND vs BORKVIBES vs FATGFVIBES vs BORKVIBES vs SPSNNEEGY vs VIBES
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.