HostNEAR vs ICP — price, size and safety, side by side
NEAR (Ethereum) vs ICP (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
NEAR vs ICP — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| NEAR | ICP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4.87 | $3.27 |
| Market cap | $15.74M | $1.65B |
| 24h volume | $995.23K | $1.06M |
| Liquidity | $420.92K | $400.75K |
| FDV | $15.78M | $814.98K |
| Holders | 14,552 | 6,391 |
| Age (days) | 904 | 320 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- ICP measures ~105× the market cap of NEAR
- NEAR measures ~2.3× the holder count of ICP
- over the shared window NEAR moved +15.9% while ICP moved +10.6%
What the data says
NEAR
NEAR at 0x85f17cf997934a597031b2e18a9ab6ebd4b9f6a4 is the Ethereum-issued claim on the NEAR asset — a wrapped deployment 904 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $15.7 million market cap across 3.8 million local units.
The tape outpaces the book: $995.2 thousand of 24-hour volume against $420.9 thousand of workable tracked depth — turnover above twice the pool daily, the signature of an asset that clears through routed flow rather than deep standing liquidity. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
ICP
ICP at 0x00f3c42833c3170159af4e92dbb451fb3f708917 is a wrapped claim on the Internet Computer token trading on Base, 320 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $1.6 billion market cap dwarfs the $815.0 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 275.6 thousand local units — a thin slice of a billion-dollar asset.
The local book is thin against the headline but the tape is hot: $400.8 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself multiple times a day through routed flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, NEAR or ICP?
By tracked market cap: NEAR (Ethereum) measures $15.74M and ICP (Base) measures $1.65B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, NEAR or ICP?
On the contract checks we publish: NEAR (Ethereum) grades B and ICP (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have NEAR and ICP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show NEAR at +15.9% and ICP at +10.6%.
More comparisons
NEAR vs PRLNEAR vs HIMSNEAR vs CRVNEAR vs SUPERPAXG vs ICPICP vs BLACKGP vs ICPPOWER vs ICP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.