HostMETH vs MORPHO — price, size and safety, side by side
METH (Mantle) vs MORPHO (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-13.
METH vs MORPHO — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| METH | MORPHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.95K | $1.98 |
| Market cap | $521.50M | $1.50B |
| 24h volume | $1.01M DEX | $20.85M all venues |
| Liquidity | $1.68M | $1.56M |
| FDV | $68.94M | $54.73M |
| Holders | 16,954 | 146,158 |
| Age (days) | 883 | 682 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- MORPHO measures ~2.9× the market cap of METH
- MORPHO measures ~21× the 24h volume of METH
- MORPHO measures ~8.6× the holder count of METH
What the data says
METH
One detail on METH didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, METH carries a $1.65M pool, 16,954 holders and 883 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap near $583.84M, that $1.65M of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 16,954-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created METH holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
MORPHO
MORPHO is the Morpho protocol's token — and Morpho is one of the most-used lending primitives in DeFi: isolated lending markets that other platforms (including Coinbase's cbBTC-backed loans) build on top of rather than competing with. The contract 0xbaa5cc21fd487b8fcc2f632f3f4e8d37262a0842 is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $1.6 million of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026.
The honest shape: MORPHO is a governance-and-alignment token on genuinely deep infrastructure — the protocol's TVL is real, the integrations are real — but the token itself was transfer-restricted at launch and unlocks later, so the float-vs-FDV gap and the token's actual claim on protocol growth are the two numbers to watch. Real product, thin float — that combination cuts both ways.
FAQ
Which is bigger, METH or MORPHO?
By tracked market cap: METH (Mantle) measures $521.50M and MORPHO (Base) measures $1.50B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, METH or MORPHO?
On the contract checks we publish: METH (Mantle) grades B and MORPHO (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have METH and MORPHO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show METH at −21.2% and MORPHO at −17.1%.
More comparisons
ELEVATE vs METHEURC vs METHMETH vs ONDOUSD0 vs METHMORPHO vs ONDOELEVATE vs MORPHOEURC vs MORPHOUSD0 vs MORPHO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.