HostEURC vs METH — price, size and safety, side by side
EURC (Base) vs METH (Mantle) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-15.
EURC vs METH — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| EURC | METH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.10 | $1.95K |
| Market cap | $519.03M | $521.50M |
| 24h volume | $48.79M all venues | $1.01M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.76M | $1.68M |
| FDV | $59.00M | $68.94M |
| Holders | 113,304 | 16,954 |
| Age (days) | 176 | 883 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- EURC measures ~48× the 24h volume of METH
- EURC measures ~6.7× the holder count of METH
- over the shared window EURC moved −1.22% while METH moved −21.2%
What the data says
EURC
EURC is Circle's euro stablecoin on Base — the euro-denominated sibling of USDC, issued under the same regulated-issuer model. The contract 0x60a3e35cc302bfa44cb288bc5a4f316fdb1adb42 is what our scan tracks: $1.8 million of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026.
The single thing to get right: this token is stable against the euro, not the dollar — its USD price moves with EUR/USD, and a dollar-based holder carries FX exposure either direction. Underneath that sits the standard Circle model — fiat reserves held by the issuer, redemption through Circle's channels, and the issuer's ability to freeze addresses, which is a feature of the regulated model rather than a bug to discover later.
METH
One detail on METH didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, METH carries a $1.65M pool, 16,954 holders and 883 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap near $583.84M, that $1.65M of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 16,954-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created METH holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, EURC or METH?
By tracked market cap: EURC (Base) measures $519.03M and METH (Mantle) measures $521.50M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, EURC or METH?
On the contract checks we publish: EURC (Base) grades B and METH (Mantle) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have EURC and METH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show EURC at −1.22% and METH at −21.2%.
More comparisons
EURC vs ELEVATEUSD0 vs EURCUSDT vs EURCEURC vs MORPHOELEVATE vs METHMETH vs MORPHOMETH vs ONDOUSD0 vs METH
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.