HostMAGIC vs LDO — price, size and safety, side by side
MAGIC (Arbitrum) vs LDO (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
MAGIC vs LDO — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| MAGIC | LDO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05171 | $0.4846 |
| Market cap | $17.46M | $402.01M |
| 24h volume | $15.81K | $409.00K |
| Liquidity | $131.05K | $1.09M |
| FDV | $16.24M | $484.61M |
| Holders | 408,713 | 63,889 |
| Age (days) | 900 | 1,561 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- LDO measures ~23× the market cap of MAGIC
- LDO measures ~8.3× the liquidity of MAGIC
- LDO measures ~26× the 24h volume of MAGIC
- MAGIC measures ~6.4× the holder count of LDO
What the data says
MAGIC
MAGIC at 0x539bde0d7dbd336b79148aa742883198bbf60342 is the Arbitrum-native currency of the Treasure gaming ecosystem — the token that denominates its marketplace and underpins its chain. The September 27, 2026 snapshot counts 408,713 holders around a $17.5 million market cap, the local supply of 313.9 million units reading $16.2 million fully diluted.
Two measured facts carry the read. The contract is an upgradeable proxy — the code behind the address can be swapped after deployment, the standard shape for a managed ecosystem token and a measured fact here, not a rumor. And tracked depth of $131.1 thousand is thin against the cap, on $16.0 thousand of daily volume — this is an asset whose trading happens across venues, not in one deep pool. The ten largest wallets hold 66.0% of supply, which on an ecosystem token usually means treasury and bridge contracts rather than free-floating whales.
LDO
LDO is Lido DAO's governance token — the vote share over the largest staking pool in crypto, the operator set behind stETH and wstETH (both covered separately in this corpus). The contract 0x5a98fcbea516cf06857215779fd812ca3bef1b32 is the canonical deployment; our September 27, 2026 read shows $1.1 million of tracked pool liquidity at a $0.39 handle.
The honest mechanics: LDO is governance, not cash flow — it doesn't pay you a share of Lido's fee revenue, it buys influence over who gets to run validators and what the treasury does. Its risk is its dominance: Lido's share of staked ETH is large enough that regulators and the Ethereum community itself periodically debate capping it, and that debate is the LDO chart. A governance token on the biggest single point of staking centralization is a strange asset — know that is what it is.
FAQ
Which is bigger, MAGIC or LDO?
By tracked market cap: MAGIC (Arbitrum) measures $17.46M and LDO (Ethereum) measures $402.01M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, MAGIC or LDO?
On the contract checks we publish: MAGIC (Arbitrum) grades B and LDO (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have MAGIC and LDO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show MAGIC at +7.13% and LDO at +9.81%.
More comparisons
NST vs MAGICGOR vs MAGICMAGIC vs GBACKMAGIC vs PONSCRED vs LDOAKE vs LDOLDO vs AURALDO vs BAS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.