HostLONG vs SLC — price, size and safety, side by side
LONG (Base) vs SLC (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
LONG vs SLC — normalized performance, 2026-09-21T00:07:28 to 2026-09-26T06:07:05
| LONG | SLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001031 | $6.47 |
| Market cap | — | $54.28M |
| 24h volume | $18.28M | $1.72M |
| Liquidity | $5.19M | $5.06M |
| FDV | — | $71.89M |
| Holders | 5,098 | 20,069 |
| Age (days) | 0 | 71 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- LONG measures ~11× the 24h volume of SLC
- SLC measures ~3.9× the holder count of LONG
What the data says
LONG
LONG on Base — contract 0x75da26c86806c261865faa25d80333ec8ee41b07 — was brand-new at its September 26, 2026 snapshot, already carrying $5.2 million of liquidity and $18.3 million of daily volume — a 3.5x pool turnover on day zero.
Numbers that large on a same-day contract describe either a heavily backed launch (a funded team provisioning deep liquidity from the start) or the loudest volume-generation operation in this cohort — and the honest note is that both produce identical snapshot rows. The `b07` address tail matches the vanity-suffix pattern shared by the winning "OpenAI" contracts in this index, suggesting a common launch operation behind the biggest impostor/churn instruments on Base.
SLC
SLC at 0x8ac96df1d3dbd7c99a54cb4e50599ce129015e50 — styled StarLink — is a very young BNB Chain book: 71 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot, with 20,069 holders sharing an 11.1 million supply. The snapshot carries no market-cap reading; the priced float is what the pools and the book say it is.
The grading pulls in opposite directions. For depth, $5.1 million of tracked liquidity is deep — the best absolute pool in this batch — on $1.7 million of 24-hour volume. Against it: mint authority is still active and new supply can be minted — and the ten largest wallets hold 99.7% of supply, an essentially single-bracket book behind a wide holder count. Freeze authority is revoked, and the contract is not a proxy.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LONG or SLC?
By tracked market cap: LONG (Base) measures — and SLC (BNB Chain) measures $54.28M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LONG or SLC?
On the contract checks we publish: LONG (Base) grades A and SLC (BNB Chain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LONG and SLC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21T00:07:28 and 2026-09-26T06:07:05, the measured snapshots show LONG at 0.00% and SLC at 0.00%.
More comparisons
MU vs LONGLONG vs ONYCZEC vs LONGLONG vs POPCATPOPCAT vs SLCONYC vs SLCSLC vs PENGUSLC vs ARGUS
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21T00:07:28→2026-09-26T06:07:05; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.