NexLIT vs USD₮0 — price, size and safety, side by side
LIT (Ethereum) vs USD₮0 (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-15.
LIT vs USD₮0 — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| LIT | USD₮0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.27 | $1.00 |
| Market cap | $861.99M | $3.32B |
| 24h volume | $137.72M all venues | $1.18M DEX |
| Liquidity | $931.10K | $753.74K |
| FDV | $3.39B | $18.74M |
| Holders | 9,530 | 75,853 |
| Age (days) | 246 | 418 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- USD₮0 measures ~3.9× the market cap of LIT
- LIT measures ~117× the 24h volume of USD₮0
- USD₮0 measures ~8.0× the holder count of LIT
- over the shared window LIT moved −9.84% while USD₮0 moved −0.37%
What the data says
LIT
LIT is Lighter's token — the equity of one of the higher-volume perpetual DEXes running, a zk-rollup venue that settles Ethereum-grade while quoting like a centralized exchange. The contract 0x232ce3bd40fcd6f80f3d55a522d03f25df784ee2 is the deployment our scan tracks, at $931 thousand of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026.
The honest read: the venue is real — Lighter has sat near the top of perp-DEX volume rankings — and the question is the standard one for fresh exchange tokens: how much of the venue's economics actually accrue to the token, and what the post-airdrop float looks like as unlocks land. Volume is the claim; the token's claim on it is what to verify.
USD₮0
There's a small gap on this page — USD₮0's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
By the numbers, USD₮0 is showing thin liquidity of $625.54K, 75,853 holders and an established record at 418 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $625.54K of depth against a market cap of about $4.08B — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: USD₮0 reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. A 75,853-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LIT or USD₮0?
By tracked market cap: LIT (Ethereum) measures $861.99M and USD₮0 (Berachain) measures $3.32B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LIT or USD₮0?
On the contract checks we publish: LIT (Ethereum) grades A and USD₮0 (Berachain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LIT and USD₮0 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show LIT at −9.84% and USD₮0 at −0.37%.
More comparisons
LIT vs AKELIT vs USDT0LIT vs TBTCLIT vs USDC.EUSD₮0 vs TBTCUSD₮0 vs USDC.EUSDT0 vs USD₮0USD₮0 vs HLX
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.