NexLIT vs TBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
LIT (Ethereum) vs TBTC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-13.
LIT vs TBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-14 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| LIT | TBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.27 | $67.91K |
| Market cap | $861.99M | $313.88M |
| 24h volume | $137.72M all venues | $14.80M all venues |
| Liquidity | $931.10K | $27.87M |
| FDV | $3.39B | $313.88M |
| Holders | 9,530 | 25,280 |
| Age (days) | 246 | 886 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- LIT measures ~2.7× the market cap of TBTC
- TBTC measures ~30× the liquidity of LIT
- LIT measures ~9.3× the 24h volume of TBTC
- TBTC measures ~2.7× the holder count of LIT
- over the shared window LIT moved −27.2% while TBTC moved −13.8%
What the data says
LIT
LIT is Lighter's token — the equity of one of the higher-volume perpetual DEXes running, a zk-rollup venue that settles Ethereum-grade while quoting like a centralized exchange. The contract 0x232ce3bd40fcd6f80f3d55a522d03f25df784ee2 is the deployment our scan tracks, at $931 thousand of pool liquidity as of November 6, 2026.
The honest read: the venue is real — Lighter has sat near the top of perp-DEX volume rankings — and the question is the standard one for fresh exchange tokens: how much of the venue's economics actually accrue to the token, and what the post-airdrop float looks like as unlocks land. Volume is the claim; the token's claim on it is what to verify.
TBTC
tBTC is Threshold Network's trust-minimized wrapped Bitcoin — the decentralized-custody answer to WBTC, where a rotating set of node operators secures the BTC rather than a single custodian. The deployment 0x18084fba666a33d37592fa2633fd49a74dd93a88 is the v2 mint; our November 6, 2026 snapshot reads $27.9 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest contrast is the whole point of the asset: tBTC trades BitGo's institutional custody for a threshold-signature committee — no single company can lose or freeze the coins, but the security model is cryptographic-economic (operator collateral) rather than legal, which is a different risk shape, not a strictly smaller one. Its depth vs WBTC's billions is the market's honest verdict on how much that trade matters to people.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LIT or TBTC?
By tracked market cap: LIT (Ethereum) measures $861.99M and TBTC (Ethereum) measures $313.88M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LIT or TBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: LIT (Ethereum) grades A and TBTC (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LIT and TBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-14 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show LIT at −27.2% and TBTC at −13.8%.
More comparisons
LIT vs AKELIT vs USDT0LIT vs USD₮0LIT vs USDC.ETBTC vs GHOTBTC vs CIRBTCRLUSD vs TBTCTBTC vs SUSDE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-14→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.