HostLINK.E vs MEOW — price, size and safety, side by side
LINK.E (Avalanche) vs MEOW (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-26.
LINK.E vs MEOW — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| LINK.E | MEOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $14.26 | $0.0009416 |
| Market cap | $10.67B | $33.22K |
| 24h volume | $16.06K | $3.09M |
| Liquidity | $91.58K | $90.48K |
| FDV | $5.21M | $33.22K |
| Holders | 13,081 | 2,634 |
| Age (days) | 1,121 | 300 |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- LINK.E measures ~321,073× the market cap of MEOW
- MEOW measures ~193× the 24h volume of LINK.E
- LINK.E measures ~5.0× the holder count of MEOW
- over the shared window LINK.E moved +9.37% while MEOW moved 0.00%
What the data says
LINK.E
LINK.E at 0x5947bb275c521040051d82396192181b413227a3 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of Chainlink's token — the ".e" suffix marking the older bridge's claim — 1,121 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $10.7 billion market cap dwarfs the $5.2 million fully-diluted figure priced on 365.7 thousand local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $91.6 thousand of tracked depth on $72.6 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
MEOW
MEOW — Kittehcoin on Base, contract 0x03ee11923326d54a580af44ec633f1cdcb414632 — is the index's oldest specimen: 300 days old at its September 26, 2026 snapshot, an age almost nothing in the churn cohort reaches. $90 thousand of liquidity and $3.1 million of daily volume — a 34x turnover.
"Kittehcoin" is a resurrection name — an early-2014-era cat coin of the same name existed back when doge was new, making this a heritage revival: someone relaunched crypto's oldest meme name on Base. Three hundred days of survival plus $3M daily volume says the revival found a market.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LINK.E or MEOW?
By tracked market cap: LINK.E (Avalanche) measures $10.67B and MEOW (Base) measures $33.22K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LINK.E or MEOW?
On the contract checks we publish: LINK.E (Avalanche) grades C and MEOW (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LINK.E and MEOW performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show LINK.E at +9.37% and MEOW at 0.00%.
More comparisons
PUNCH vs LINK.EZAUTH vs LINK.ETRCH1 vs LINK.EBUCKAZOIDS vs LINK.E401JK vs MEOWAVO vs MEOWFWDI vs MEOWMEOW vs USO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.