HostZAUTH vs LINK.E — price, size and safety, side by side
ZAUTH (Solana) vs LINK.E (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
ZAUTH vs LINK.E — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| ZAUTH | LINK.E | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.001763 | $14.26 |
| Market cap | $1.85M | $10.67B |
| 24h volume | $18.49K | $16.06K |
| Liquidity | $91.74K | $91.58K |
| FDV | $1.85M | $5.21M |
| Holders | 2,421 | 13,081 |
| Age (days) | — | 1,121 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- LINK.E measures ~5,762× the market cap of ZAUTH
- LINK.E measures ~5.4× the holder count of ZAUTH
- over the shared window ZAUTH moved +3.76% while LINK.E moved +10.2%
What the data says
ZAUTH
zauthx402 — ZAUTH — an x402-sector token (the agent-payments protocol wave: HTTP-native micropayments for machine clients) on Solana at mint DNhQZ1CE9qZ2FNrVhsCXwQJ2vZG8ufZkcYakTS5Jpump. The September 26, 2026 snapshot shows about $92 thousand of liquidity and roughly 2,421 holders.
The x402 narrative is real — machine-to-machine payments is a genuine emerging category — and sector tokens on it are thesis-priced: the bet is that this project's rails get used, not that current volume proves it. The honest scan-can't-answer question is whether agent traffic actually flows through it.
LINK.E
LINK.E at 0x5947bb275c521040051d82396192181b413227a3 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of Chainlink's token — the ".e" suffix marking the older bridge's claim — 1,121 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $10.7 billion market cap dwarfs the $5.2 million fully-diluted figure priced on 365.7 thousand local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $91.6 thousand of tracked depth on $72.6 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZAUTH or LINK.E?
By tracked market cap: ZAUTH (Solana) measures $1.85M and LINK.E (Avalanche) measures $10.67B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZAUTH or LINK.E?
On the contract checks we publish: ZAUTH (Solana) grades A and LINK.E (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZAUTH and LINK.E performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show ZAUTH at +3.76% and LINK.E at +10.2%.
More comparisons
ZAUTH vs PUNCHTRCH1 vs ZAUTHBUCKAZOIDS vs ZAUTHVVAIFU vs ZAUTHPUNCH vs LINK.ETRCH1 vs LINK.EBUCKAZOIDS vs LINK.EVVAIFU vs LINK.E
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.