HostLINK.E vs 401JK — price, size and safety, side by side
LINK.E (Avalanche) vs 401JK (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
LINK.E vs 401JK — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| LINK.E | 401JK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $14.26 | $0.001296 |
| Market cap | $10.67B | $1.34M |
| 24h volume | $16.06K | $6.27K |
| Liquidity | $91.58K | $90.56K |
| FDV | $5.21M | $1.34M |
| Holders | 13,081 | 3,929 |
| Age (days) | 1,121 | — |
| Safety grade | C | A |
Where they differ
- LINK.E measures ~7,986× the market cap of 401JK
- LINK.E measures ~2.6× the 24h volume of 401JK
- LINK.E measures ~3.3× the holder count of 401JK
- over the shared window LINK.E moved +9.81% while 401JK moved −26.8%
What the data says
LINK.E
LINK.E at 0x5947bb275c521040051d82396192181b413227a3 is the legacy Avalanche Bridge deployment of Chainlink's token — the ".e" suffix marking the older bridge's claim — 1,121 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $10.7 billion market cap dwarfs the $5.2 million fully-diluted figure priced on 365.7 thousand local units.
The local book is thin for the headline: $91.6 thousand of tracked depth on $72.6 thousand of 24-hour volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
401JK
401JK — mint Cz7LGKdZPpAxonXx23ZYPW3RtDQvjcf17ZDCZEzFpump — is the anti-retirement meme token: the 401(k) retirement account with a "jk" appended, the joke being that the coin IS the retirement plan. 401jk.fun is live with a named handle. The September 26, 2026 snapshot reads $1.3 million across 3,929 holders.
~$388 of cap per wallet is a committed retail file; ~$9.2 thousand of daily volume on $91 thousand of liquidity is a functional book. Mint and freeze revoked, dev wallet effectively zero — clean levers on a well-executed joke.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LINK.E or 401JK?
By tracked market cap: LINK.E (Avalanche) measures $10.67B and 401JK (Solana) measures $1.34M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LINK.E or 401JK?
On the contract checks we publish: LINK.E (Avalanche) grades C and 401JK (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LINK.E and 401JK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show LINK.E at +9.81% and 401JK at −26.8%.
More comparisons
PUNCH vs LINK.EZAUTH vs LINK.ETRCH1 vs LINK.EBUCKAZOIDS vs LINK.E401JK vs MEOWAVO vs 401JKFWDI vs 401JK401JK vs USO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.