HostLDO vs RDNT — price, size and safety, side by side
LDO (Ethereum) vs RDNT (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
LDO vs RDNT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| LDO | RDNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4846 | $0.0004636 |
| Market cap | $402.01M | $688.76K |
| 24h volume | $409.00K | $1.39K |
| Liquidity | $1.09M | $61.05K |
| FDV | $484.61M | $459.55K |
| Holders | 63,889 | 101,322 |
| Age (days) | 1,561 | — |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- LDO measures ~584× the market cap of RDNT
- LDO measures ~18× the liquidity of RDNT
- LDO measures ~294× the 24h volume of RDNT
- RDNT measures ~1.6× the holder count of LDO
- over the shared window LDO moved +9.81% while RDNT moved −3.28%
What the data says
LDO
LDO is Lido DAO's governance token — the vote share over the largest staking pool in crypto, the operator set behind stETH and wstETH (both covered separately in this corpus). The contract 0x5a98fcbea516cf06857215779fd812ca3bef1b32 is the canonical deployment; our September 27, 2026 read shows $1.1 million of tracked pool liquidity at a $0.39 handle.
The honest mechanics: LDO is governance, not cash flow — it doesn't pay you a share of Lido's fee revenue, it buys influence over who gets to run validators and what the treasury does. Its risk is its dominance: Lido's share of staked ETH is large enough that regulators and the Ethereum community itself periodically debate capping it, and that debate is the LDO chart. A governance token on the biggest single point of staking centralization is a strange asset — know that is what it is.
RDNT
RDNT is Radiant Capital's omnichain money-market token — the Arbitrum deployment at 0x3082cc23568ea640225c2467653db90e9250aaa0 that carries the protocol's fee-share and gauge weight. The September 27, 2026 snapshot prices a $688.8 thousand market cap across 101,322 wallets — a wide base holding a small cap.
Three caveats stack. The contract can mint new supply, so circulation is a floor. The top ten wallets hold about 82.5% — a heavily concentrated float for a lending-protocol token. And the tracked book, $61.0 thousand of pool liquidity, is thin against even this reduced cap — the grade is C at 67, not a misprint.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LDO or RDNT?
By tracked market cap: LDO (Ethereum) measures $402.01M and RDNT (Arbitrum) measures $688.76K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LDO or RDNT?
On the contract checks we publish: LDO (Ethereum) grades C and RDNT (Arbitrum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LDO and RDNT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show LDO at +9.81% and RDNT at −3.28%.
More comparisons
CRED vs LDOAKE vs LDOLDO vs AURALDO vs BASETHFI vs RDNTEXA vs RDNTRDNT vs 114514RDNT vs GIKO
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.