HostLDO vs GRT — price, size and safety, side by side
LDO (Ethereum) vs GRT (Arbitrum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
LDO vs GRT — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T18:22:06
| LDO | GRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.4846 | $0.0281 |
| Market cap | $402.01M | $307.50M |
| 24h volume | $409.00K | $30.30K |
| Liquidity | $1.09M | $60.60K |
| FDV | $484.61M | $94.73M |
| Holders | 63,889 | 119,699 |
| Age (days) | 1,561 | 1,325 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- LDO measures ~18× the liquidity of GRT
- LDO measures ~13× the 24h volume of GRT
- GRT measures ~1.9× the holder count of LDO
- over the shared window LDO moved +9.81% while GRT moved +20.5%
What the data says
LDO
LDO is Lido DAO's governance token — the vote share over the largest staking pool in crypto, the operator set behind stETH and wstETH (both covered separately in this corpus). The contract 0x5a98fcbea516cf06857215779fd812ca3bef1b32 is the canonical deployment; our September 27, 2026 read shows $1.1 million of tracked pool liquidity at a $0.39 handle.
The honest mechanics: LDO is governance, not cash flow — it doesn't pay you a share of Lido's fee revenue, it buys influence over who gets to run validators and what the treasury does. Its risk is its dominance: Lido's share of staked ETH is large enough that regulators and the Ethereum community itself periodically debate capping it, and that debate is the LDO chart. A governance token on the biggest single point of staking centralization is a strange asset — know that is what it is.
GRT
GRT at 0x9623063377ad1b27544c965ccd7342f7ea7e88c7 — Graph Token — is the Arbitrum deployment of The Graph protocol's indexing-work asset, 1,325 days into its record at the September 27, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $307.5 million market cap sits well above the $94.7 million fully-diluted figure priced on 3.4 billion local units.
The local book is thin for the headline's scale: $60.6 thousand of tracked depth on $42.1 thousand of 24-hour volume — a layer-two slice where the protocol's real settlement happens through indexer economics, not the pool. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LDO or GRT?
By tracked market cap: LDO (Ethereum) measures $402.01M and GRT (Arbitrum) measures $307.50M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LDO or GRT?
On the contract checks we publish: LDO (Ethereum) grades C and GRT (Arbitrum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LDO and GRT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T18:22:06, the measured snapshots show LDO at +9.81% and GRT at +20.5%.
More comparisons
CRED vs LDOAKE vs LDOLDO vs AURALDO vs BASWCT vs GRTGRT vs 我的刀盾GRT vs GHOSTGIKO vs GRT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T18:22:06; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.