NexLBTC vs JUP — price, size and safety, side by side
LBTC (Ethereum) vs JUP (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-13 / 2026-11-15.
LBTC vs JUP — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| LBTC | JUP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $72.25K | $0.2621 |
| Market cap | $496.32M | $824.50M |
| 24h volume | $15.45M all venues | $51.88M all venues |
| Liquidity | $4.71M | $4.66M |
| FDV | $496.32M | $1.70B |
| Holders | 23,269 | 837,158 |
| Age (days) | 606 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- JUP measures ~1.7× the market cap of LBTC
- JUP measures ~3.4× the 24h volume of LBTC
- JUP measures ~36× the holder count of LBTC
- over the shared window LBTC moved −7.71% while JUP moved +8.06%
What the data says
LBTC
LBTC is Lombard's staked bitcoin — BTC deposited into Lombard, restaked into Babylon's bitcoin-security layer, and the liquid receipt traded here. The contract 0x8236a87084f8b84306f72007f36f2618a5634494 is the canonical Ethereum deployment — LBTC also exists on Solana under a different mint, covered separately. Our November 6, 2026 read shows $4.7 million of tracked pool liquidity at a bitcoin-denominated $78,290 handle.
The honest shape: LBTC is "productive BTC" with layers named — Lombard's custody of the underlying, Babylon's restaking economics, and the wrapper contract itself — versus plain WBTC's single-custodian simplicity. The yield is emissions-shaped today, so the honest comparison is what you give up for it: additional contracts, additional operators, additional ways to fail.
JUP
JUP is the governance token of Jupiter, the aggregator that routes the majority of Solana's swap volume — including, full disclosure, many of the swaps on this site. That makes it one of the few large Solana tokens whose underlying "business" is directly observable on-chain: every day's routed volume is public, and the token's relevance rises and falls with it. As of the November 6, 2026 snapshot, JUP carries roughly $824.5 million of market capitalization across 837,158 holders at mint JUPyiwrYJFskUPiHa7hkeR8VUtAeFoSYbKedZNsDvCN.
The structural read is clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. No one can inflate the supply by fiat and no one can lock a holder's tokens — the two failure modes that account for most of the wreckage this site catalogues. Distribution is genuinely broad; an 800-thousand-wallet base came from one of the largest airdrop programs in Solana's history, which spread ownership widely but also created recurring, scheduled moments of sell pressure as later distribution rounds unlocked. Supply events like that are public calendar items, not hidden risks, but they are worth knowing about before reading any chart move as organic.
FAQ
Which is bigger, LBTC or JUP?
By tracked market cap: LBTC (Ethereum) measures $496.32M and JUP (Solana) measures $824.50M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, LBTC or JUP?
On the contract checks we publish: LBTC (Ethereum) grades B and JUP (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have LBTC and JUP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show LBTC at −7.71% and JUP at +8.06%.
More comparisons
JLP vs LBTCSPX vs LBTCLBTC vs PSTAERO vs LBTCJLP vs JUPSPX vs JUPJUP vs PSTAERO vs JUP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.