NexJLP vs LBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
JLP (Solana) vs LBTC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-11-15 / 2026-11-13.
JLP vs LBTC — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-11-13T12:15:58
| JLP | LBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.68 | $72.25K |
| Market cap | $787.56M | $496.32M |
| 24h volume | $5.43M all venues | $15.45M all venues |
| Liquidity | $4.80M | $4.71M |
| FDV | $787.56M | $496.32M |
| Holders | 89,531 | 23,269 |
| Age (days) | — | 606 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- JLP measures ~1.6× the market cap of LBTC
- LBTC measures ~2.8× the 24h volume of JLP
- JLP measures ~3.8× the holder count of LBTC
What the data says
JLP
JLP is not a normal token and should not be read like one: it is the liquidity-provider share of Jupiter's perpetuals exchange — a claim on a managed basket of SOL, ETH, wBTC and stablecoins that serves as the counterparty to every trader on the venue. The November 6, 2026 snapshot values the deployment at roughly $788 million across 89,531 holders on mint 27G8MtK7VtTcCHkpASjSDdkWWYfoqT6ggEuKidVJidD4 — the largest asset on this page's list after the platform tokens.
Both authority flags read unconfirmed in this snapshot, and for once that is close to inevitable: a pool share mints when liquidity is deposited and burns when it is withdrawn, so live mint machinery — program-held — is the design. The honest statement remains "unresolved in this read, verify live," and the scanner above does exactly that; what a holder is actually trusting is the Jupiter perps program, not an SPL switch.
LBTC
LBTC is Lombard's staked bitcoin — BTC deposited into Lombard, restaked into Babylon's bitcoin-security layer, and the liquid receipt traded here. The contract 0x8236a87084f8b84306f72007f36f2618a5634494 is the canonical Ethereum deployment — LBTC also exists on Solana under a different mint, covered separately. Our November 6, 2026 read shows $4.7 million of tracked pool liquidity at a bitcoin-denominated $78,290 handle.
The honest shape: LBTC is "productive BTC" with layers named — Lombard's custody of the underlying, Babylon's restaking economics, and the wrapper contract itself — versus plain WBTC's single-custodian simplicity. The yield is emissions-shaped today, so the honest comparison is what you give up for it: additional contracts, additional operators, additional ways to fail.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JLP or LBTC?
By tracked market cap: JLP (Solana) measures $787.56M and LBTC (Ethereum) measures $496.32M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JLP or LBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: JLP (Solana) grades A and LBTC (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JLP and LBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-11-13T12:15:58, the measured snapshots show JLP at −11.4% and LBTC at −7.71%.
More comparisons
JLP vs JUPSPX vs JLPAERO vs JLPJLP vs PSTLBTC vs JUPSPX vs LBTCLBTC vs PSTAERO vs LBTC
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-11-13T12:15:58; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.