HostJLUSDT vs JUICED — price, size and safety, side by side
JLUSDT (Solana) vs JUICED (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-19 / 2026-09-19.
JLUSDT vs JUICED — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-19T11:01:11
| JLUSDT | JUICED | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.05 | $1.04 |
| Market cap | $17.40M | $57.95M |
| 24h volume | $449.66K | $1.09M |
| Liquidity | — | — |
| FDV | $17.40M | $57.95M |
| Holders | 2,320 | 3,816 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- JUICED measures ~3.3× the market cap of JLUSDT
- JUICED measures ~2.4× the 24h volume of JLUSDT
- JUICED measures ~1.6× the holder count of JLUSDT
What the data says
JLUSDT
One detail on JLUSDT didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-16 snapshot: its authority state. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
On liquidity and holders, JLUSDT shows a holder base of 2,320 as of 2026-09-16. A 2,320-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it.
JUICED
JUICED is the page in this cohort where honesty about limits matters most, so it leads with them: beyond the name its metadata carries, this token doesn't come with a public story our read can verify, and this page won't invent one. What the chain shows at mint 7GxATsNMnaC88vdwd2t3mwrFuQwwGvmYPrUQ4D6FotXk, per NexFlow's September 16, 2026 snapshot: roughly $57.9 million of represented value held by 3,816 wallets, a freeze authority that reads revoked, and the value-equals-pool signature that characterizes receipt tokens — staking or yield-pool shares whose worth tracks deposits — rather than free-floating traded assets.
That signature shapes how to read everything else. A receipt token's supply expands and contracts with its pool by design, so "can supply grow?" has the same answer as for every liquid-staking token this site grades: yes, mechanically, as the product operating — with the freeze-authority check (passed here) being the one that actually protects holders. The nearly four thousand wallets holding it imply a real user base for whatever the underlying product is, not a treasury parked in a wrapper.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JLUSDT or JUICED?
By tracked market cap: JLUSDT (Solana) measures $17.40M and JUICED (Solana) measures $57.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JLUSDT or JUICED?
On the contract checks we publish: JLUSDT (Solana) grades A and JUICED (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JLUSDT and JUICED performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-19T11:01:11, the measured snapshots show JLUSDT at +0.10% and JUICED at +0.12%.
More comparisons
JLUSDT vs RYYJLUSDT vs FKBJLUSDT vs CRDJLUSDT vs RDKJUICED vs RYYJUICED vs FKBJUICED vs CRDJUICED vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-19T11:01:11; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.