HostJLUSDT vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
JLUSDT (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-19 / 2026-09-19T11:01:11.
JLUSDT vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-19T11:01:11
| JLUSDT | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.05 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $17.40M | — |
| 24h volume | $449.66K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | — | $1.99B |
| FDV | $17.40M | — |
| Holders | 2,320 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~8,957× the 24h volume of JLUSDT
What the data says
JLUSDT
One detail on JLUSDT didn't fully resolve in the 2026-09-16 snapshot: its authority state. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
On liquidity and holders, JLUSDT shows a holder base of 2,320 as of 2026-09-16. A 2,320-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: NexFlow's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, JLUSDT or CRD?
By tracked market cap: JLUSDT (Solana) measures $17.40M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, JLUSDT or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: JLUSDT (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have JLUSDT and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-19T11:01:11, the measured snapshots show JLUSDT at +0.10% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
JLUSDT vs RYYJLUSDT vs FKBJLUSDT vs RDKJLUSDT vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-19T11:01:11; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.