HostICP vs FUN — price, size and safety, side by side
ICP (Base) vs FUN (Polygon) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
ICP vs FUN — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| ICP | FUN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.27 | $8.02 |
| Market cap | $1.65B | $303.44M |
| 24h volume | $1.06M | $27.72K |
| Liquidity | $400.75K | $2.75M |
| FDV | $814.98K | $336.65M |
| Holders | 6,391 | 31,222 |
| Age (days) | 320 | 106 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ICP measures ~5.4× the market cap of FUN
- FUN measures ~6.9× the liquidity of ICP
- ICP measures ~38× the 24h volume of FUN
- FUN measures ~4.9× the holder count of ICP
- over the shared window ICP moved +10.6% while FUN moved −9.92%
What the data says
ICP
ICP at 0x00f3c42833c3170159af4e92dbb451fb3f708917 is a wrapped claim on the Internet Computer token trading on Base, 320 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot. The asset-wide $1.6 billion market cap dwarfs the $815.0 thousand fully-diluted figure priced on 275.6 thousand local units — a thin slice of a billion-dollar asset.
The local book is thin against the headline but the tape is hot: $400.8 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself multiple times a day through routed flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FUN
FUN — deployed as FunPay on Polygon — is a 106-day-old payments-branded token at 0x7ee08c0fa1cb2a0ca40f309427d104a0d176eeb9, priced at a $303.4 million market cap against $2.8 million of tracked pool liquidity on the September 27, 2026 snapshot.
The ratio is the story: a nine-figure headline valuation resting on a seven-figure exit book means the price is set at the margin — a modest sell order can move it hard, and the page's own depth flag says so. Contract-level controls weren't evaluated in this snapshot, so mint, pause, and blacklist states stay open questions for the live scan rather than assumptions this page makes.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ICP or FUN?
By tracked market cap: ICP (Base) measures $1.65B and FUN (Polygon) measures $303.44M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ICP or FUN?
On the contract checks we publish: ICP (Base) grades B and FUN (Polygon) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ICP and FUN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show ICP at +10.6% and FUN at −9.92%.
More comparisons
PAXG vs ICPICP vs BLACKGP vs ICPPOWER vs ICPMSETH vs FUNSOL vs FUNAUSD vs FUNUB vs FUN
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.