HostIBS vs BNC4 — price, size and safety, side by side
IBS (BNB Chain) vs BNC4 (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-26 / 2026-09-26.
IBS vs BNC4 — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-26T18:07:24
| IBS | BNC4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $8.32 | $6.07 |
| Market cap | $23.92M | $7.95M |
| 24h volume | $934.39K | $1.53M |
| Liquidity | $8.36M | $6.03M |
| FDV | $23.80M | $7.95M |
| Holders | 227,215 | 71,736 |
| Age (days) | 152 | 13 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- IBS measures ~3.0× the market cap of BNC4
- BNC4 measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of IBS
- IBS measures ~3.2× the holder count of BNC4
- over the shared window IBS moved −10.9% while BNC4 moved −5.73%
What the data says
IBS
IBS at 0x255e746abb8d9acac00d6d023e5e63e3b8dfa7cd is a young BNB Chain asset — 152 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot — priced at a $23.9 million market cap across a compact 2.6 million supply.
The pool is the standout read in this batch: $8.4 million of tracked depth is deep — a third of the entire market cap sits in the exit book, a ratio most mid-caps never approach. The $934.4 thousand of daily volume is proportionate rather than frenzied. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the authority posture is a live-scan question rather than an assumption this page makes.
BNC4
BNC4 at 0x7c8d5502b544ddaf8852fc46d1174e34876d545c — deployed under the corporate-style name "Cea Industries" — is one of the youngest books in this index: 13 days into its record at the September 26, 2026 snapshot and already priced at an $8.0 million market cap on a 1.2 million supply.
For a two-week-old book the pool is unusually strong: $6.0 million of tracked depth is deep — three-quarters of the cap — on $1.5 million of 24-hour volume, a tape that trades rather than sits. Everything else about the row is unwritten: no holder distribution in this snapshot, no contract-level controls assessed — a book this young carries its proof in the days ahead, not the record behind.
FAQ
Which is bigger, IBS or BNC4?
By tracked market cap: IBS (BNB Chain) measures $23.92M and BNC4 (BNB Chain) measures $7.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, IBS or BNC4?
On the contract checks we publish: IBS (BNB Chain) grades C and BNC4 (BNB Chain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have IBS and BNC4 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-26T18:07:24, the measured snapshots show IBS at −10.9% and BNC4 at −5.73%.
More comparisons
BABYDOGE vs IBSIBS vs QQQBETH vs IBSUSDE vs IBSBNC4 vs EUSXSTONK vs BNC4EVA vs BNC4BNC4 vs JUP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-26T18:07:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.