HostGOHM vs UST — price, size and safety, side by side
GOHM (Avalanche) vs UST (Avalanche) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
GOHM vs UST — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-27T15:10:18
| GOHM | UST | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $5.53K | $0.005974 |
| Market cap | — | $79.67K |
| 24h volume | $3.54K | $2.06K |
| Liquidity | $116.22K | $68.14K |
| FDV | $3.42M | $88.12K |
| Holders | 7,457 | 7,230 |
| Age (days) | 1,758 | 1,705 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- GOHM measures ~1.7× the liquidity of UST
- GOHM measures ~1.7× the 24h volume of UST
What the data says
GOHM
GOHM — Governance OHM — is the wrapped-governance form of Olympus's OHM, and it is one of the oldest assets in this batch: 1,758 days on the September 27, 2026 snapshot, at 0x321e7092a180bb43555132ec53aaa65a5bf84251 on Avalanche.
The numbers need their unit context: a per-token price of $5,479.54 across a supply of 621 pieces prices a market cap of $3.4 million, against $116.2 thousand of tracked liquidity — a thin but proportional book for a vestige asset. GOHM inherits its risk twice: the wrapper contract and the rebasing OHM underneath it, and this snapshot didn't evaluate contract-level controls.
UST
UST on Avalanche at 0x260bbf5698121eb85e7a74f2e45e16ce762ebe11 — "Axelar Wrapped UST" — is a remnant of the TerraUSD collapse carried over a bridge: what was once the dollar-pegged stablecoin now trades around $0.006, kept alive as a speculative claim on nothing in particular.
At the September 27, 2026 snapshot the book reads like an artifact rather than a market: $68 thousand of liquidity against a $80 thousand cap — a pool bigger than the cap, because the price already found its floor — across 1,705 days of history and a few thousand dollars of daily volume. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot, so the wrapper's levers are unverified.
FAQ
Which is bigger, GOHM or UST?
By tracked market cap: GOHM (Avalanche) measures — and UST (Avalanche) measures $79.67K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, GOHM or UST?
On the contract checks we publish: GOHM (Avalanche) grades C and UST (Avalanche) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have GOHM and UST performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-09-27T15:10:18, the measured snapshots show GOHM at +1.00% and UST at +2.59%.
More comparisons
GOHM vs XERISTRUMAN vs GOHMGOHM vs KOHAIFRIC vs GOHMKURUMI vs USTUST vs XAUT0UST vs PAXUST vs CLUDE
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-09-27T15:10:18; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a NexFlow product.